Legal Wrangling Continues Between Longmont, CO And Mile-Hi Skydiving | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Thu, Apr 25, 2019

Legal Wrangling Continues Between Longmont, CO And Mile-Hi Skydiving

Judge Denies TRO Request Against The City, But Also Will Not Expedite A Hearing On Airport Rules

The long legal battle between Mile-Hi Skydiving and the City of Longmont, CO will not come to an early resolution, as the city had requested, but a judge has also refused to grant the skydiving company's request for a Temporary Restraining Order against the city.

The Times Call newspaper reports that Mile-Hi had requested the restraining order to prevent the city from implementing a new fee structure for renting land at the airport, and the installation of a surveillance system that would be used to assure that the company's clients land within the designated drop zone in paid-for public area.

The city had asked that Boulder District Judge Thomas Francis Mulvahill hear the case this month, but the hearing has been pushed back until May 31.

In its response to the city's motion to expedite, Mile-Hi had requested the temporary restraining order on the land use fees and video system. But Judge Mulvahill also denied the TRO, saying the company could not seek such relief in the response to the motion, which it had done. The judge also said Mile-Hi failed to establish that the company and its clients are being "irreparably harmed" by the city's actions.

 Mile-Hi continues to seek a preliminary injunction against the fee structure, under which the city charges just under 11 cents per square foot for the drop zone on an annual contract.

The judge also denied the city's request for an expedited hearing on a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the district court lacks jurisdiction in the case. The city argues that only the FAA can decide whether the complaint by Mile-Hi that the city's new airport policy is discriminatory has any merit.

The Longmont City Council met in a closed-door session Tuesday to discuss the case.

(Images from file)

FMI: Source report
Source report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.30.24): Runway Centerline Lighting

Runway Centerline Lighting Flush centerline lights spaced at 50-foot intervals beginning 75 feet from the landing threshold and extending to within 75 feet of the opposite end of t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.30.24)

Aero Linx: Air Force Global Strike Command Air Force Global Strike Command, activated August 7, 2009, is a major command with headquarters at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, i>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.29.24: EAA B-25 Rides, Textron 2024, G700 Deliveries

Also: USCG Retires MH-65 Dolphins, Irish Aviation Authority, NATCA Warns FAA, Diamond DA42 AD This summer, history enthusiasts will have a unique opportunity to experience World Wa>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC