Concorde Tested First on Chickens | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Jan 14, 2003

Concorde Tested First on Chickens

They're Just Like People, Only Cheaper

A recent Dominic Casciani story for the BBC explained that, "Papers newly released by the British Government reveal how scientists tested Concorde's sonic boom for damage against humans - by firing it at French chickens in a barn."

In 1969, everybody knew the Concorde was coming; but no one knew just how its sonic boom would affect the people below the commercial supersonic transport's flight path, especially as it would be repeated, hitting the same people, day after day.

Britain has a rule similar to the US's Freedom of Information Act, called the "30-year Rule," and under it, reporters found out how those who run things determined that the Concorde would be safe for the psyches of the ground-bound.

Engineers really didn't know how humans would react to repeated exposure, so, lacking proper human subjects to experiment on, they used nature's closest relative: the chicken. OK -- so it's not the closest thing in Nature to a human, but chickens were plentiful, available, and (if all didn't go well) relatively cheap.

The first tests were made using authentic sonic-boom sounds on eggs. The chickens that hatched from those eggs were examined for any ill effects of either physical or nervous nature. After the chicks hatched, their reactions, both auditory and affective, were noted, when subjected to additional sonic boom stimulation. No differences between the previously-subjected, egg-tested chicks and the control group were discerned.

A different test, on live broiler chickens, was set up. The engineers were to test, on 2800 living birds, the effect of the big boom. The scientists didn't know, going in, whether the chickens would panic; of if they might ignore the noise. They didn't know if it would affect their weight -- or it it might provoke them, lemming-like, into some societally-destructive behavior.

A few blasts of the boom-horn settled that hash. The chickens' reaction, according to the report, was the, "...sudden and complete immobility of all the chickens. There was a simultaneous cessation of all the cheeping for a maximum of 40 seconds - whereupon normal activity resumed. ...There was no evidence of collective hysteria crowding or crushing due to fright - even during the critical period when the feathers are grown."

They tried and they tried, but, "Repetition of the booms had no economic effect on the industrial raising of chickens subjected to the booms compared with those which were not."

Since chickens, presumably, are (at least to our rulers) just like people, Casciani reported, "The scientists told the officials all their studies suggested the 'probability of immediate direct injury to persons exposed to sonic boom is essentially zero.'"

One wonders why those results didn't yield more-tolerant supersonic flight rules...

FMI: www.concordesst.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC