Alabama Supreme Court Tosses Lawsuit Suit Stemming From 2005 Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sun, Jul 21, 2013

Alabama Supreme Court Tosses Lawsuit Suit Stemming From 2005 Accident

Said Accident, Which Occurred in Oklahoma, Happened Too Long Ago

The Alabama Supreme Court says that Teledyne Continental Motors has waited too long to try to recover legal fees and court costs from the manufacturer of an engine component that was implicated in an accident which fatally injured three people.

The three fatally injured were Harland Brent Stonecipher, who was employed as a pilot by Pre-Paid Legal Services, now known as LegalShield; his wife Tina and his 11-year-old daughter Nicole. The NTSB found in its probable cause report that the Cessna 310 Stonecipher was flying suffered a loss of engine power as a result of a fatigue fracture in one of the crankshaft gear teeth for undetermined reasons. Also causal was the pilot's failure to maintain control of the twin-engine airplane after the power loss, which resulted in an inadvertent stall and subsequent collision with terrain.

Continental at the time tried to recreate the manufacturing process that could have led to the failure of the gear, but was unable to do so. The NTSB said the cause of the gear tooth failure could not be determined. The company eventually settled the first lawsuit brought in 2007.

The Insurance Journal reports that Continental sued the company which manufactured the crankshaft that failed in 2011, saying the part did not meet its specifications. A judge initially ruled that Alabama's two-year statute of limitations did not apply, using the standard of six years for contract claims.

But this week, the Alabama Supreme Court disagreed, saying the two-year limit should apply, and dismissed the case. Continental had no comment on the ruling.

FMI: http://judicial.alabama.gov/supreme.cfm

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC