Kansas Jury Awards $48 Million In Skydiving Plane Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, May 03, 2011

Kansas Jury Awards $48 Million In Skydiving Plane Accident

Finds That London-Based Doncasters Used Non-Standard Alloys In Engine Maintenance

A jury in Kansas on Thursday awarded $48 million to the families of five of the six people fatally injured when a DHC-6 Twin Otter carrying skydivers suffered a catastrophic engine failure just after takeoff and went down near Sullivan Airport in rural Missouri southwest of St. Louis. The family of one of those killed in the accident did not participate in the lawsuit.


Quantum Leap Skydiving Twin Otter

The Union, MO jury ordered London, U.K.-based Doncasters to pay $4 million to each family, along with an additional $28 million in punitive damages to be divided between the families, according to a report in the Kansas City Star. The right engine of the aircraft "blew up" on July 29, 2006 just after takeoff. The plane narrowly missed a house when it went down. No one on the ground was injured. The plane was being operated by Quantum Leap Skydiving of Sullivan, MO. On its website, Doncasters says it is an "international engineering group that manufactures precision components and assemblies for the aerospace, industrial gas turbines, specialist automotive, petrochemical, construction, industrial, transportation and recreation markets."

Gary Robb, the attorney who represented the families, said court testimony revealed that Dorncasters used an engine part made from an alloy not approved by the manufacturer, Pratt & Whitney Canada, which was possibly responsible for as many as eight other engine failures. "Lives will be saved because of what this jury did," Robb said.

FMI: www.courts.mo.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC