NTSB Recommends Inclusion Of Bounced Landing Recovery Techniques | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Sep 08, 2005

NTSB Recommends Inclusion Of Bounced Landing Recovery Techniques

Should Be Included In Manuals Following 2004 Executive Airlines Accident

The NTSB has determined that the probable cause of the May 9, 2004 accident involving Executive Airlines, that crashed while landing at Luis Munoz Marin International Airport San Juan, Puerto Rico, was the captain's failure to execute proper techniques to recover from bounced landings and his subsequent failure to execute a go-around.

As a result of the accident, the Safety Board recommended that the Federal Aviation Administration require all airlines to incorporate bounced landing recovery techniques in their flight manuals and teach these techniques during initial and recurrent training.

On May 9, 2004, Executive Airlines, flight 5401, was doing business as an American Eagle flight from Mayaguez, Puerto Rico to San Juan, Puerto Rico. During the landing, the airplane bounced twice before coming to a complete stop on a grassy area about 217 feet from the runway 's centerline and about 4,317 feet beyond the runway. The captain was seriously injured.

The first officer, 2 flight attendants, and 16 of the 22 passengers received minor injuries. Damage to the aircraft was substantial.

During its investigation, the Safety Board also learned that the left aileron surface position data recorded by the accident airplane's flight data recorder was invalid even though the aircraft was modified on August 7, 2001 with position sensors and associated hardware required by a supplemental type certificate (STC).

The Safety Board issued two recommendations to the FAA that would require replacement of aileron sensors installed in accordance with the STC (ST01310NY) and call for a review of all FDR systems that have been modified by a STC to ensure that the sensors provide reliable data.

A synopsis of the report, including a complete list of the Conclusions and Recommendations, can be found on the Board's website.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC