U.S. Disappointed In EU ETS Court Decision | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Sat, Dec 24, 2011

U.S. Disappointed In EU ETS Court Decision

Officials Say They Have 'Strong Legal Objections'

A State Department official says that the U.S. Government is strongly opposed to the imposition of a European emissions cap-and-trade scheme on U.S. flagged airliners. The EU's highest court affirmed the Union's right to impose the fees in a decision handed down Wednesday.

"We continue to have strong legal and policy objections to the inclusion of flights by non-EU air carriers in the EU ETS," said Krishna R. Urs, deputy assistant secretary for transportation affairs at the U.S. State Department. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had warned of possible reprisals before the ruling was made public.

Reuters reports that China's state-run news agency Xinhua warned of a possible trade war if the tax is imposed, though that country's foreign ministry did not take that hard-line stance. Various non-European airline associations have also vehemently opposed the measure, and have released statements reiterating the opposition in the days following the ruling.

European officials say that the threats of trade wars or sanctions are "rhetoric," but some non-European analysts say that some kind of retaliation, even if it is minor, is to be expected to show that the U.S. disapproves of the tax. U.S.-flagged carriers have said they will grudgingly pay the tax if it comes to that, though they are considering their legal options. Legislation is still pending in Congress that would make it illegal for U.S. airlines to comply with the law, which could place the companies in a no-win situation.

The EU has vowed to "hold firm" on the fee, and points out that if U.S. and other airlines are taking "equivalent measures" then no tax will be imposed.

FMI: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_en.htm

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC