Santa Monica Mishandled Airport Loans, FAA Finds | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Dec 10, 2019

Santa Monica Mishandled Airport Loans, FAA Finds

Agency Says City Also Mishandled Landing Fees And Leases

The FAA last month released a decision from a 2016 complaint filed by tenants of Santa Monica Airport which found that the city mishandled loans to its airport and discrepancies in leases.

The Santa Monica Lookout reports that the FAA uncovered information showing that the city charged below-market rents to non-aviation tenants, and refused to offer long-term leases to aeronautical tenants.

The primary complaint held that the city charged interest rates of up to eight percent on loans to the airport, resulting in an overcharge in interest payments of up to $2.78 million for fiscal years 2008-2009 and 2013-2014. Kevin C. Willis, the FAA's director of airport compliance, said the loans were "insufficiently and improperly documented as such and fail to satisfy the requirements of loans" under FAA policies.

Willis has ordered the city to "adjust the outstanding allowable loan balances to reflect the payment, in full, of the November, 2004 advance of $2,839,729." The adjustment is subject to FAA approval. He further ordered the city to "credit the improper interest payments charged to the airport fund totaling $743,665 and $515,672 and the principal overpayment of $188,873, plus interest from the date of each improper payment."

The city also has 60 days to "update its methodology and fees to reflect current and actual costs in the use of the Airport."

Santa Monica Airport supporters call the decision a "morsel of good news." City officials say they are "considering their options" concerning the decision.

(Image from file)

FMI: Source report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC