Also Question "Gap" For Small Cargo Operators

We're hearing more and more complaints from major airlines over an FAA proposal mandating an "aging aircraft" management program. The airlines say it's unnecessary -- and would cost too much.

"Unfortunately, the proposed rule is quite simply unjustified. It should not be made final," the industry's primary trade group, the Air Transport Association, said in documents filed with the Transportation Department.

Reuters reports the program would required aircraft manufacturers and airlines to begin an inspection program aimed at older aircraft, such as the MD-80. Eventually, it would apply to all aircraft as they grow older.

The FAA estimates the program would add about $360 million to the industry's operating costs over the next 20 years. But the Air Transport Association pegs that number closer to $3 billion.

That's quite a difference... but the FAA maintains that even with the extra cost, airlines would ultimately SAVE money under the rule.

Carriers say what they're doing to maintain aging aircraft is just fine right now... and expensive changes are the last thing an already cash-strapped industry needs right now.

In related news, the House Subcommittee on Aviation is meeting to discuss what critics of the aging aircraft rule are calling a gap. They say the rule doesn't include many aircraft used by smaller cargo carriers. 

The Miami Herald reports those carriers are experiencing almost one crash every month. During the hearing the FAA is also likely to catch flak from the committee on controller staffing, and the questionable safety record of the Mitsubishi MU-2.

FMI: www.airlines.org, www.faa.gov