U.S. Senate: JSF Is Essentially Three Different Airplanes | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 18, 2016

U.S. Senate: JSF Is Essentially Three Different Airplanes

Air Force Lt. General Says The Three Variants Are Only About 20-25 Percent 'Common'

From the outside, the three variants of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter look very similar. But they are very different airplanes with very different missions, according to the U.S. Senate, and the head of the JSF program.

In a draft of the Senate's National Defense Authorization Act of 2017, the Senate states: "Despite aspirations for a joint aircraft, the F-35A, F-35B and F-35C are essentially three distinct aircraft, with significantly different missions and capability requirements.”

National Interest online reports that earlier this year, U.S. Air Force lieutenant general Christopher Bogdan, head of the JSF program office, said during a recent seminar that the three variants of the F-35 have only about 20-25 percent of their components in common. Air Force Magazine reported that Brogen said it is "almost like three separate production lines." A true JSF is difficult, he said, because each branch insists on its unique requirements.

The language indicating that the aircraft are three airplanes may not make it all the way through the budget process. Similar language may not be included in the House version of the Defense Authorization Act, and therefore not make it into the reconciliation bill.

In its NDAA language, the Senate requires the JSF program office to close by 2019, when the plane should be in full-rate production. It would then be split into three different programs for the Air Force, Navy and Marines. “Devolving this program to the services will help ensure the proper alignment of responsibility and accountability the F-35 program needs and has too often lacked,” the Senate said.

(Images from file)

FMI: www.armed-services.senate.gov


Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC