Santa Monica Runway TRO Lifted | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Oct 17, 2017

Santa Monica Runway TRO Lifted

Judge Says City Can Proceed With The Runway Shortening

The City of Santa Monica may proceed with shortening the runway at Santa Monica Airport (KSMO) after a temporary restraining order halting the work was lifted by U.S. District Judge Ronald Lew, who had put it in place.

The Santa Monica Patch reports that Airport Director Stelios Makrides said that the city is pleased with the court's decision, "which allows it to fulfill its commitment to the community and the FAA. The city will renew work on the runway-shortening project, which it expects to commence within the next week, and will continue to update you on matters relating to that project."

The court had put the TRO in place at the request of Santa Monica residents Kate Scott and James Babinski, a pilot. They said that the city had failed to meet public hearing requirements when it made the decision to shorten the runway as part of an overall agreement with the FAA to close the airport entirely by the end of 2028. They also said that shortening the runway would make the airport less safe. Judge Lew said that Scott and Babinski would "likely prevail at trial on the merits of their claim."  He also noted that the city had not filed opposition to the TRO.

Shortly after the order was imposed, the city filed 1,400 pages of documents supporting its case, and requested an expedited review. The city said that the Brown act concerning public hearings did not apply to the runway shortening because it did not require action to be taken. The city said it followed all applicable laws in its decision to shorten the runway. Judge Lew agreed, saying that since the runway shortening project does not involve land acquisition, no public hearing was required. The court also disagreed that safety would be jeopardized after reviewing city and FAA documents.

(Image from file)

FMI: Original Reports Patch

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC