FAA Can't Prove It Inspected USAirways Maintenance Contractor | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, May 13, 2003

FAA Can't Prove It Inspected USAirways Maintenance Contractor

Inspector Says He Was There Before Flight 5481 Crashed

It's an embarrassing situation - one that could have career implications for a particular FAA inspector. Jerry Unruh was supposed to have inspected a maintenance provider subcontracted for the airline by Raytheon. Unruh was supposed to have inspected the subcontractor in Huntington (WV) twice before US Airways Express Flight 5481 crashed upon take-off at Charlotte-Douglas Airport Jan. 8. He was supposed to have inspected the West Virginia facility at least once after that. But FAA documents obtained by The Charlotte Observer indicate otherwise.

Re-entered Records

Unruh told The Observer he remembers traveling from his home base in Wichita (KS) to Structureal Modification And Repair Technicians before the Huntington facility started taking sub-contractor work from Raytheon. But when The Charlotte Observer asked the FAA for records of the visits prior to the Jan. 8 crash, administration officials couldn't produce them.

Instead, the paper reports, Unruh apparently went back into the FAA computer and entered information from the inspections on May 2 - after he had been interviewed by reporters. When asked about pre-dating that inspection report, Unruh refused comment.

Two days after Flight 5481 crashed, killing all 21 on board, FAA inspectors did make a documented visit to the SMART plant. There, a mechanic who worked on the Beech 1900 told them he remembered adjusting the commuter's control cables, but expected his supervisor to check the work before the aircraft was sent back into service. That supervisor check was apparently never made. The last flight of the Beech 1900 was its first fully-loaded flight since the cables had been adjusted.

Now, the NTSB is focused on those very control cables, as the board conducts a public hearing on the Charlotte crash May 20. Board members will also hear from expert witnesses who believe the load on board 5481 exceeded the Beech 1900's 17,120 gross maximum.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov/aviation/aviation.htm

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC