Comanche Cancellation Continues To Hurt Suppliers | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Tue, Mar 09, 2004

Comanche Cancellation Continues To Hurt Suppliers

Cut Crimps DynaBil's Plans

Aerospace manufacturer DynaBil Industries Inc. stands to see a hard-won piece of business evaporate with the U.S. Army's cancellation of the Comanche helicopter program. The Army requested Feb. 23 that plans to develop and produce the sleek, fast, stealth helicopters be canceled. While certainly not the only company to be affected by the loss of business, this small supplier will feel the crunch much harder than larger entities, such as Boeing or Sikorsky.

"We'll get paid for what we've done," said Hugh Quigley, president of the company. "I'm more upset because of the long-range business we're going to lose because of this."

That would be a blow to DynaBil, which makes parts for both commercial and defense aircraft. In 2003, the company generated $14 million in sales. It won a contract to make parts such as titanium firewalls and exhaust systems on the Comanche, which was being co-developed by Chicago based Boeing Co. and Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. of Stratford (CT).

DynaBil expected the contract to bring in between $2 million and $3 million in 2004. It was also a welcome bit of diversification for the company, which was hit hard by the downturn in commercial aviation that followed Sept. 11. While commercial giants such as Boeing had been buffeted by massive changes in the aerospace industry, smaller suppliers such as DynaBil had to deal with trickle-down turbulence.

"It's not good news, but it's not devastating either," said Quigley. "We've got to go work harder at something else, that's all."

The fate of the Comanche is now a political football. Some lawmakers have vowed to fight the program's cancellation. The Army has spent approximately $6.9 billion on the Comanche program over its 20-year history, and had planned to spend $14 billion on 121 Comanche helicopters by 2011. In 1999, the U.S. General Accounting Office released a report detailing potential cost overruns on the $48 billion project. Also, critics said that the craft does not fit into the military's future plans.

FMI: www.boeing.com/rotorcraft/military/rah66/rah66_back.htm

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC