FAA Issues SAFO Focusing On GPS/Autopilot Interface | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Mar 12, 2014

FAA Issues SAFO Focusing On GPS/Autopilot Interface

Says Not All Installations Have Resulted In 'Ideal' Performance

The FAA has issued a Safety Alert for Operators (SAFO) focusing on continuing reports of GPS/ GNSS installations or upgrades in which integration with existing autopilots has resulted in less than ideal performance in some modes or conditions. Lateral and vertical performance of particular combinations of legacy autopilots and GPS/GNSS systems may or may not have been considered by the equipment manufacturer during the original integration and certification of the GPS/GNSS.

According to the FAA, the problems and issues caused by coupled GPS/GNSS and autopilot systems may cause an increase in workload for the flightcrew when it comes to complying with rules of separation and navigation. The situation is typically the result of incompatibility in the interface between legacy autopilots and the new or upgraded navigation source. Of particular concern is navigation equipment originally intended for Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 23 aircraft installed on Part 25 aircraft. These alterations leverage existing Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) data for use in field approvals but neither the compatibility of the equipment/system to the particular aircraft nor compliance with the applicable airworthiness standards were adequately evaluated. The GPS/GNSS manufacturer has not, in most cases, evaluated compatibility with every autopilot or other interface that may be encountered, nor is that the FAAs expectation during the original STC approval. Instead, the GPS/GNSS manufacturer tests a limited number of combinations for integration, and lists those deemed compatible on their STC.

The FAA recommends that all operators, maintenance personnel, Organization Designation Authorizations (ODA), Designated Engineering Representative (DER), and repair stations are reminded that when choosing to install or upgrade systems or equipment by means other than STC, a thorough evaluation of the alteration must still be accomplished.

The evaluation must address system compatibility where it has not been previously established. It is the responsibility of the installer to ensure that all of the considerations and applicable airworthiness standards have been addressed for installation and operation of the equipment or systems, including proper lateral and vertical coupling and in-flight performance of the autopilot.

For system combinations where incompatibility of input and output requirements result in non-functional or degraded modes of operation a solution may be to include a digital-to-analog or roll steering converter, as appropriate, in the navigator/autopilot interface. Available guidance includes Advisory Circular (AC) 20-138C, Airworthiness Approval of Positioning and Navigation Systems which in turn references other ACs that address autopilot compatibility and compliance.

Operators experiencing less than ideal performance following GPS/GNSS installations or upgrades that are integrated with existing autopilots should contact the installer to ensure a proper evaluation of the integration was accomplished prior to installation. Installers must recognize further showings and FAA engineering involvement may be necessary if satisfactory installed performance of the system cannot be achieved by the installer. Operators should suspend use of coupled autopilot modes if the conditions discussed in this SAFO exist until the cause(s) are identified and remedied.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC