T-34 ADs: AMOC Could Keep 'Em Flying | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Mon, Mar 15, 2004

T-34 ADs: AMOC Could Keep 'Em Flying

EAA, AOPA, T-34 Association Trying To Prevent Entire Fleet From Being Grounded

Sport and GA advocacy groups are banding together to stop the FAA from grounding the entire T-34 fleet. And it seems to be working.

The FAA has now approved an alternative methods of compliance (AMOC) submitted by the T-34 Association regarding revised airworthiness directive (AD) 2001-13-18 R1 that deals with T-34 wing spar failures. The revised AD recently invalidated previous AMOCs approved for the original AD because FAA feels they do not address all four critical areas prone to fatigue cracks in the aircraft’s wing spar assemblies. However, the T-34 Association submitted new AMOCs that incorporate inspection of the rear spars.

Without approved AMOCs, a large number of the aircraft will effectively be grounded when the revised AD goes into effect Monday. Affected aircraft include Raytheon Aircraft Corp. Beech Models 45 (YT-34), A45 (T-34A, B-45), and D45 (T-34B).

"We don't have hard numbers yet, but it appears that a very high percentage of T-34s will be grounded," said AOPA Director of Regulatory and Certification Affairs Luis Gutierrez. "The few shops that are authorized to do the necessary work are already backlogged. These backlogs could lead to significant delays in scheduling and extended down time for aircraft owners."

In 1999 a T-34 engaged in mock aerial combat crashed. The resulting examination revealed fatigue cracks at multiple locations in the wings of the accident aircraft. As an interim fix, the FAA issued an AD instating airspeed and G-load limitations while Raytheon developed a "mandatory" service bulletin to inspect the critical fatigue locations. In 2001 FAA finalized the AD mandating wing-spar inspections and approved four AMOCs to address fatigue concerns. Then in November 2003, a second T-34 crashed after experiencing a separation of the right wing. Two people died in that Texas crash. In both cases, the wing separated at the same point on the aircraft. The only difference was that the second aircraft had an additional separation point at the lower wing attach fitting not inspected in any of the AMOCs issued for the original AD.

FMI: www.eaa.org, www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsitems/2004/20011318ad_r1.txt, www.t-34.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC