House Armed Services Committee Member Asks For F-35 Operational Date | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 05.02.16

Airborne 04.26.16

AEA2016 LIVE!!! 0830-1230ET

AEA2016 LIVE!!! 1400-1700ET

AEA2016 LIVE!!! 1100-1400ET

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 05.02.16

Airborne 04.26.16

AEA2016 LIVE!!! 0830-1230ET

AEA2016 LIVE!!! 1400-1700ET

AEA2016 LIVE!!! 1100-1400ET

AEA2016 LIVE Aero-TV: 04/27-0830ET, 04/28-1400ET, 04/29-1100ET

Sun 'n Fun 2016 Innovation Preview on Vimeo!

Sun 'n Fun 2016 Innovation Preview on YouTube!

Fri, May 11, 2012

House Armed Services Committee Member Asks For F-35 Operational Date

Attempted To Tie Some Funding To The Announcement Of A Date Certain

A Republican member of the House Armed Services Committee was thwarted on Wednesday in an attempt to tie funding for the F-35 JSF to a guaranteed operational date from the Defense Department.

Representative Todd Akin (R-MO) (pictured) offered an amendment to an appropriations bill during a markup session in the HASC. His amendment would have withheld half of the procurement funds if the Pentagon did not give Congress a firm operational date for the JSF by March of 2013.

The amendment was opposed by every other member of the committee. The Hill reports that Akin said it was one that members had been told to vote against the measure, though he did not say who had made that suggestion. "“In the markup yesterday (Wednesday) I offered a number of amendments to ensure that we are getting the squeal out of our nickels in the Defense Department. The F-35 program is the most expensive program in DOD history and has repeatedly faced cost overruns and broken schedules. I offered an amendment to hold the program accountable and demand transparency. Unfortunately, the committee significantly watered down my amendment," he said in a news release.

Instead, members backed a substitute offered by Washington State Democrat Adam Smith, who said withholding procurement funding would send a bad message to foreign governments who are partners on the $1.5 trillion program. Some have said they will pull their support if design and other problems persist with the Lightning II.

Akin was the only "no" vote on the Smith substitute.

FMI: http://armedservices.house.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (05.02.16)

“The past months were amazing for ARCA Space Corporation, as the ArcaBoard was prepared for production. We couldn’t be happier knowing how fortunate we are to create an>[...]

Delta Orders Additional Airbus A321 Jets

Order For 37 More A321s Brings The Total Order Book To 82 Of The Large Narrowbody Aircraft Delta Air Lines has reached an agreement with Airbus to acquire 37 additional A321s as pa>[...]

Klyde Morris (05.02.16)

Klyde: The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same! FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

FAA Small UAS Rules Getting Closer

Proposed Regulations For Small UAS Operation Have Been Forwarded To The OMB For A Final Look After waiting for an extended time, the FAA has finally forwarded its proposed regulati>[...]

Airborne 04.26.16: Drone v Airplane-NOT!, eFusion Electric Plane, ANN@AEA-LIVE!!

Also: MU-2 AOA, AMA Responds To Senate FAA Reauthorization, ANN@AEA Live 04/27-0830ET, ANN@AEA Live 04/28-1400ET, ANN@AEA Live 04/29-1100ET A report of a drone possibly colliding w>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2016 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC