Wed, Apr 23, 2003
Tuesday, AOPA asked a federal judge in Michigan to
issue a summary judgment in the association's lawsuit against the
state's pilot background check law. "The state of Michigan does not
dispute the facts of this case," said AOPA Counsel Kathy Yodice.
"All that remains is for the court to decide whether or not, as
AOPA contends, federal law preempts the state's background check
law under the U.S Constitution's Supremacy Clause (Article VI,
clause 2). Today's motion asks the judge to proceed straight to his
ruling."
Both the FAA and the Transportation Security Administration have
written letters supporting AOPA's position. In its filing, AOPA
argues that the Michigan law is preempted both because of the
pervasiveness of federal regulation in aviation safety and security
matters as well as setting pilot eligibility standards, and because
the state law conflicts with federal efforts to create a uniform
national standard.
Citing numerous sections of the U.S. Code, AOPA
argues, "Congress clearly mandated that the FAA consider national
security in carrying out its functions, creating a 'culture' of
security consideration. Many of the safety functions of the FAA
inherently contain an element of aviation security and national
security. Thus, there is a general scheme placing the
responsibility for aviation security regulation, for the purposes
of national security and safety, in the federal government's
exclusive domain.
"The FAA is no longer the only agency responsible for aviation
security. Congress vested sweeping authority over security in the
TSA. "Together with the explicit and vast law of Congress governing
aviation security, the TSA's and the FAA's exercise of their
security powers occupy the field of aviation security. Thus, states
have no room to maneuver in that field."
AOPA's motion concludes, "To date, the intent of
the United States Congress and the authority conferred on the U.S.
Government Agencies remains manifest that aviation security is
exclusively a federal government responsibility, so that a uniform,
appropriate system can be maintained nationwide. ... For all of the
reasons presented to this Court, AOPA respectfully requests that
this Court grant the attached Motion for Summary Judgment."
More News
Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]
Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]
Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]
From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]
Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]