Some Lawmakers Question Exclusive USAF Contract With ULA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.14.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.17.24

Wed, Aug 15, 2012

Some Lawmakers Question Exclusive USAF Contract With ULA

Encourage Competition For EELV Program

The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and the panel's ranking Democrat have sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta urging the Pentagon to consider SpaceX and Orbital Sciences for a launch contract for a critical program.

Congressman Mike Rogers (R-MI) (pictured, left) and C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger (D-MD) (pictured, right) sent the letter August 2nd. In it, they say the U.S. Government heavy launch capability "lacks domestic competition and is unable to compete internationally due to high costs. These escalating costs leave a growing burden on U.S. taxpayers and our defense and intelligence budgets."

Currently, ULA has the only booster capable of lifting the military's heaviest payloads into orbit ... the Delta IV. Some payloads in the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program will tip the scale at 50,000 pounds. But in the letter, Congressmen Rogers and Ruppersberger say that "the good news is that new entrants such as Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) and Orbital Sciences Corp. are developing impressive capabilities that are breathing new life into the U.S. space launch market." They cite the Falcon 9 mission that launched a Dragon spacecraft for a successful docking mission to ISS.

"While long overdue, the Air Force should be commended for its current effort to reduce the cost of the ULA arrangement while studying the capability of potential competitors," the congressmen said. But "We are concerned that the Service may offer ULA a five-year "no compete" block buy of launches ... we are concerned that any EELV block buy that goes beyond three years' worth of launches will unnecessarily exclude competition.

"We also believe that we must work harder to reduce the barriers to new competitors for EELV launches, to include eliminating the infrastructure subsidy we provide to ULA and rapidly articulating clear entrance criteria for new competitors."

The Huffington Post reports that the EELV contract could be worth $19 billion. It is expected to be awarded next year.

FMI: http://rogers.house.gov, http://ruppersberger.house.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.17.24): Very High Frequency

Very High Frequency The frequency band between 30 and 300 MHz. Portions of this band, 108 to 118 MHz, are used for certain NAVAIDs; 118 to 136 MHz are used for civil air/ground voi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.17.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Suppliers Association Established February 25, 1993, the Aviation Suppliers Association (ASA), based in Washington, D.C., is a not-for-profit association, repre>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: ANN Visits Wings Over The Rockies Exploration Of Flight

From 2021 (YouTube Version): Colorado Campus Offers aVariety Of Aerospace Entertainment And Education Wings over the Rockies Exploration of Flight is the second location for the Wi>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.16.24: PRA Runway, Wag-Aero Sold, Young Eagles

Also: Paramotor Champ's, Electric Ultralight, ICON BK Update, Burt Rutan at Oshkosh! The Popular Rotorcraft Association is reaching out for help in rebuilding their private runway >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC