Family Of Skydiver Lost In Sullivan Accident Sues | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Fri, Aug 04, 2006

Family Of Skydiver Lost In Sullivan Accident Sues

Says P&W, Skydiving Company, Airport Responsible For Daughter's Death

The National Transportation Safety Board has yet to issue its preliminary report on last Saturday's accident involving a skydiving plane near Sullivan, MO... but that doesn't mean the lawyers are waiting to assign blame.

The parents of Victoria Delacroix, 22 -- who perished in the accident, along with five others -- filed a lawsuit Thursday claiming negligence led one of the DeHavilland DHC-6's engines to fail, leading to the accident.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports Vivian and Susan Delacroix of Kent, England, are suing engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney; Quantum Leap Skydiving Center; Adventure Aviation, owner of the accident aircraft; and Sullivan Regional Airport, which serviced the plane -- saying all are responsible for the death of their daughter.

"Our initial investigation points to a right engine failure just after takeoff," said Gary C. Robb, a Kansas City attorney representing the family. Witnesses say the plane's right engine burst into flames moments after the plane took off, Robb added.

As Aero-News reported, the DHC-6 went down in a residential area shortly after takeoff from the airport on a planned skydiving mission. There were only two survivors of the accident.

Calls by the Post-Dispatch to Quantum Leap and the city of Sullivan -- which owns the airport -- were not returned. A spokesperson with Pratt & Whitney also declined to comment, stating it corporate policy not to discuss incidents still under investigation.

Robb, apparently, does not share that sentiment.

"There were some of the most experienced skydivers in the world on that plane, and not even they could jump from that altitude," Robb said.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC