Firefighting Tankers Could Be Back | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Tue, May 18, 2004

Firefighting Tankers Could Be Back

Interior Department: "Might Put The Air Tankers Back In Service"

The Interior Department's decision to ground 33 aging firefighting tankers may not be the last word after all. The department Monday said it would be willing to consider returning the tankers to the fireline if the FAA can certify their safety.

"There are things we can look at that might put the air tankers back in service," said Assistant Interior Secretary Rebecca Watson. "Short-term, we are looking at how we deal with this fire season. And I think we have a good plan."

As ANN reported last week, the Forest Service and the Department of Interior yanked the contracts from 33 aerial tankers over safety concerns.

The sudden decision stunned the contractors and left firefighters wondering how they were going to deal with a wildfire season that already seemed to be in full swing.

The decision to ground the older tankers came after two fatal crashes in 2002. Both aircraft belonged to Hawkins & Powers Aviation, based in Greybull (WY). Both lost wings in flight.

Other aerial firefighting contractors said they were being penalized for one company's poor record.

The decision leaves 491 firefighting aircraft on the front lines, as Watson predicts this may be one of the worst fire seasons on record.

"We are anticipating a year like 2000," Watson said. "We have very dry fuels out there. In fact, the large-diameter fuels are at their driest level in recorded history."

Watson said her department and the Forest Service just aren't capable of certifying firefighting aircraft. "The land management agencies are not in the business of aircraft safety," she said. "We don't have that capacity. But there is talk now on the (Capitol) Hill about how they might encourage the FAA to get involved."

So far, there's been no word from the FAA on whether the agency wants to become involved.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.26.24)

"General aviation is at the forefront of developing and introducing innovative technologies that will transform the entire aviation industry..." Source: Kyle Martin, Vice President>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.27.24): Direct

Direct Straight line flight between two navigational aids, fixes, points, or any combination thereof. When used by pilots in describing off-airway routes, points defining direct ro>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.27.24)

Aero Linx: Women in Corporate Aviation Women in Corporate Aviation support individuals seeking career advancement and professional development in the business aviation industry. Me>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.27.24)

“We would like to thank the many volunteers that help throughout the year to pull off the event, as well as the several reviewers, judges, and SURVICE staff that provide team>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC