FAA Proposes $211,000 Civil Penalty Against Dukes Aerospace | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Wed, Sep 02, 2015

FAA Proposes $211,000 Civil Penalty Against Dukes Aerospace

Alleges Violations Of Drug And Alcohol Testing Regulations

The FAA has proposed a $211,000 civil penalty against Dukes Aerospace Inc., of Northridge, CA, for allegedly violating federal drug and alcohol testing regulations.

The FAA alleges that Dukes failed to include four of its safety sensitive employees in random drug and alcohol testing pools. Three of the four employees performed safety sensitive functions while not in the random pool.

Additionally, the agency alleges that the company did not receive verified negative results before transferring nine employees into safety sensitive positions; ask 10 safety-sensitive employees whether they had tested positive or had refused to submit to a DOT pre-employment drug or alcohol test at other companies they had applied to for safety-sensitive transportation work during the previous two years.

Other allegations include the failure to use a scientifically valid method of random selection for a drug test, and conduct a random drug test on two employees rather than the alcohol test for which they had been selected, and ensure that an employee underwent a directly observed urine specimen collection immediately after having been informed that the employee’s earlier specimen was invalid and the employee had no adequate medical explanation for the result. The company allegedly directed a new collection, but did not specify it had to be directly observed.

Finally, the FAA says Dukes did not include all required elements in the company’s drug and alcohol testing policy, specifically, the consequences for a verified positive drug test or a refusal to test, and the consequences of using drugs while performing a safety sensitive function.
 
Dukes has requested to meet with the FAA to discuss the case.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.01.24): Say Altitude

Say Altitude Used by ATC to ascertain an aircraft's specific altitude/flight level. When the aircraft is climbing or descending, the pilot should state the indicated altitude round>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.01.24)

Aero Linx: European Air Law Association (EALA) EALA was established in 1988 with the aim to promote the study of European air law and to provide an open forum for those with an int>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Korean War Hero Twice Reborn

From 2023 (YouTube Version): The Life, Death, Life, Death, and Life of a Glorious Warbird In 1981, business-owner Jim Tobul and his father purchased a Chance-Vought F4U Corsair. Mo>[...]

Airborne 04.29.24: EAA B-25 Rides, Textron 2024, G700 Deliveries

Also: USCG Retires MH-65 Dolphins, Irish Aviation Authority, NATCA Warns FAA, Diamond DA42 AD This summer, history enthusiasts will have a unique opportunity to experience World Wa>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.02.24: Bobby Bailey, SPRG Report Cards, Skydive!

Also: WACO Kitchen Bails, French SportPlane Mfr to FL, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Innovation Preview Bobby Bailey, a bit of a fixture in sport aviation circles for his work with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC