Report: B-52 Crew Transported Nuke Weapons Over US Soil | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Wed, Sep 05, 2007

Report: B-52 Crew Transported Nuke Weapons Over US Soil

Someone Screwed Up...

Heads are going to roll. That's the opinion of one military analyst, after learning a B-52 crew inadvertantly transported six nuclear warheads from North Dakota to Louisiana last week, breaching several US Air Force and international regulations on the transport of such weapons.

Citing an original report by the Army Times, CNN reports the bomber took the missiles from Minot AFB to Barksdale AFB for decomissioning Thursday. The plane flew over several US states, with the cruise missiles carried on underwing pylons.

While the Air Force doesn't usually comment on its procedures for transporting such weapons, USAF officials told CNN the incident was a significant breach of security...  while also taking pains to reassure citizens the situation sounds a lot scarier than it actually was.

"The public was never in any danger," Lt. Col. Ed Thomas said.

That may be true, acknowledged retired USAF major general Don Shepperd... but the incident is still  alarming.

"This is a major gaffe, and it's going to cause some heads to roll down the line," said Shepperd, who now works as a military analyst for CNN. Sheppard went on to say the incident would appear to violate a Cold War-era treaty banning the aerial transport of nuclear weapons.

The plane's crew was apparently unaware the missiles were nuclear-ready. The warheads were not armed, and officials say had the aircraft crashed or the missiles become detached from the wings, they would have remained inert.

Sheppard says it's true the weapons likely would not have triggered a nuclear blast in those scenarios... but that's still small comfort. "Any time you have nuclear material on board, if the airplane crashes, nuclear material can be spread in the immediate area of the crash, so you get radioactivity in the immediate area of the crash," he said.

"This is serious business but it was not dangerous business."

As the incident involved nuclear warheads, President Bush was also notified of the error.

FMI: www.af.mil

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 05.10.24: Icon Auction, Drunk MedEvac Pilot, Bell ALFA

Also: SkyReach Parts Support, Piper Service Ctr, Airliner Near-Miss, Airshow London The Judge overseeing Icon's convoluted Chapter 11 process has approved $9 million in Chapter 11 >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.13.24): ILS PRM Approach

ILS PRM Approach An instrument landing system (ILS) approach conducted to parallel runways whose extended centerlines are separated by less than 4,300 feet and at least 3,000 feet >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.13.24)

Aero Linx: FlyPups FlyPups transports dogs from desperate situations to fosters, no-kill shelters, and fur-ever homes. We deliver trained dogs to veterans for service and companion>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Airborne 05.08.24: Denali Update, Dad-Daughter Gyro, Lake SAIB

Also: NBAA on FAA Reauth, DJI AG Drones, HI Insurance Bill Defeated, SPSA Airtankers The Beechcraft Denali continues moving forward towards certification, having received its FAA T>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC