FAA May Be On Thin Legal Ice In Pilot Certificate Revocation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Thu, Jun 30, 2016

FAA May Be On Thin Legal Ice In Pilot Certificate Revocation

UAV Operator Was Subjected To 'Emergency Revocation', But Agency May Have Acted Improperly

Ralph Rebaya is in the midst of fighting an emergency revocation of his private pilot certificate for flying a seven-pound UAV in a way the FAA says was reckless and dangerous. But the person issuing the revocation may not have had the authority to do so.

Forbes reports that Regaya's case is the first of its kind, and is currently being argued before an NTSB administrative law judge.

In its revocation order, the FAA says that Rebaya, who owns a commercial drone company, had been hired by Magellon Entertainment to operate a DJI-S-900 for the purpose of aerial filming. But Rebaya violated several clauses of his section 333 exemption, including filming in close proximity to people and operating in Class C airspace within five nautical miles from Bob Hope Airport (KBUR) There is a laundry list of other complaints, but six months after the filming took place in December, the "administrator" determined that an emergency existed and his PPL should be revoked immediately.

Forbes reports that Rebaya's attorney D. Damon Willens has based the his challenge on whether the FAA's determination that his actions were so egregious that it warranted revoking his pilot certificate for a year, and that the FAA official who issued the revocation order did not have the authority to do so.

According to Willens, the revocation order was issued by the FAA's Deputy Chief Counsel, but that position is not one of those listed in the rule delegating the authority to take such actions.

An attorney contacted by Forbes said that the FAA is generally very diligent about making sure that a person issuing such an order generally has the right to do so.

The case is still unresolved, and Rebaya's pilot certificate is still suspended. Since he needs that to fly his UAV under his Section 333 exemption, he's currently out of business.

FMI: Full Story, Revocation Order

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.01.24): Say Altitude

Say Altitude Used by ATC to ascertain an aircraft's specific altitude/flight level. When the aircraft is climbing or descending, the pilot should state the indicated altitude round>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.01.24)

Aero Linx: European Air Law Association (EALA) EALA was established in 1988 with the aim to promote the study of European air law and to provide an open forum for those with an int>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Korean War Hero Twice Reborn

From 2023 (YouTube Version): The Life, Death, Life, Death, and Life of a Glorious Warbird In 1981, business-owner Jim Tobul and his father purchased a Chance-Vought F4U Corsair. Mo>[...]

Airborne 04.29.24: EAA B-25 Rides, Textron 2024, G700 Deliveries

Also: USCG Retires MH-65 Dolphins, Irish Aviation Authority, NATCA Warns FAA, Diamond DA42 AD This summer, history enthusiasts will have a unique opportunity to experience World Wa>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.02.24: Bobby Bailey, SPRG Report Cards, Skydive!

Also: WACO Kitchen Bails, French SportPlane Mfr to FL, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Innovation Preview Bobby Bailey, a bit of a fixture in sport aviation circles for his work with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC