C-172s As 'Hostile' Aircraft... Are You Kidding? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.21.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.17.24

Fri, Jun 06, 2003

C-172s As 'Hostile' Aircraft... Are You Kidding?

DoD Needs to Know: Can an F-16 Catch a 172?

AOPA is questioning a Defense Department exercise over the Washington, D.C. area. The nighttime exercise was to have sent two F-16 fighters to intercept two Civil Air Patrol Cessna 172s over the nation's capital to test procedures for "identifying and confronting hostile aircraft," according to defense officials. The exercise, which has to be conducted in VFR conditions, was rescheduled to June 5 (last night) between 10:30 p.m. and midnight EDT.

"We're extraordinarily disappointed that the military essentially told the press that a Cessna 172 is being viewed as a 'threat' aircraft," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "There is no threat analysis we're aware of that suggests that these light general aviation aircraft represent any significant risk to the public. But the publicity surrounding this exercise can only contribute to the unfounded public paranoia concerning GA aircraft."

Just to make it "fair" (more-likely because of noise considerations), Major Don Arias, a spokesman for the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), said the interceptors wouldn't be allowed to use afterburners below a certain altitude. [We do not know if they would be allowed to use them, even in the event of a real threat --ed.]

AOPA also questioned the coordination of the exercise, noting that senior Transportation Security Administration officials knew nothing about it until it was reported in the press.

AOPA has requested that it be allowed to monitor the exercise, but so far the military has not given its approval.

AOPA's Washington, D.C., Legislative Affairs office contacted members of the Senate and House armed services committees. Some of those members of Congress have already raised their questions with the Defense Department.

The association also raised concerns about the safety of the exercise, noting that an intercept is always a risky procedure, particularly when conducted between aircraft having large speed differentials.

"Frankly, if the concern is public safety and security, we wonder why they are conducting this exercise at night over a densely populated area and in one of the busiest air traffic corridors in the nation," said Boyer.

FMI: www.aopa.org, www.defenselink.mil

Advertisement

More News

Samson Sky Hits the Wind Tunnel

Improvements Stack as Brand Readies for Mass Production Samson Sky updated followers on its flying car progress, describing some of the travails of the wind tunnel as they get clos>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.22.24): LAHSO

LAHSO An acronym for “Land and Hold Short Operation.” These operations include landing and holding short of an intersecting runway, a taxiway, a predetermined point, or>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.19.24)

Aero Linx: Space Medicine Association (SMA) The Space Medicine Branch was founded in 1951 as the first constituent organization of the Aerospace Medical Association (AsMA). In 2006>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.19.24): Back-Taxi

Back-Taxi A term used by air traffic controllers to taxi an aircraft on the runway opposite to the traffic flow. The aircraft may be instructed to back-taxi to the beginning of the>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC