Australian Official Disputes MH370 Deliberate Ditching Theory | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 23, 2018

Australian Official Disputes MH370 Deliberate Ditching Theory

Search Director Says Evidence Indicates That The Airplane Was Not Being Controlled When It Impacted The Water

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau official who directed the search for Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 says that the airliner was not under anyone's control when it impacted the Indian Ocean on March 8, 2014.

The Voice of America reports that search Director Peter Foley told an Australian Senate Committee that the evidence does not support the findings in "MH370: Mystery Solved", a new book by Canadian air crash investigator Larry Vance.

Foley told the committee that he has read the book, but still believes that the airplane was not being controlled when it impacted the water. He said that satellite transmission show that during the flight's final moments, it was in a fast descent and accelerating when the impact occurred. "If it was being controlled at the end, it wasn't very successfully being controlled," he said. "The flaps weren't deployed."

The author of the book says that the damage to a flap that was found washed up on an island near Tanzania in 2016 did not show the kind of damage that would have been caused by a high-speed impact. The other flaperon is being held by French authorities as evidence in possible criminal proceedings. The French authorities have not allowed any "meaningful" analysis, according to Foley.

Foley said that while it is not known who initially flew the airplane off course, it was "absolutely evident" that someone had. He said it was most likely that the plane was somehow depressurized in flight, and that everyone on board was likely already deceased when it went down.

Meanwhile, Ocean Infinity, a Texas-based technology company, renewed the search for the Boeing 777 this year after the government of Malaysia offered up to $70 million if the main wreckage or the plane's "black boxes" could be located.

(Image from file)

FMI: Original report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC