CASA: Flight Review And Instrument Proficiency Check Rules To Change On July 1 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jun 22, 2016

CASA: Flight Review And Instrument Proficiency Check Rules To Change On July 1

Exemptions Developed With Extensive Input From Australian Aviation Community

Australia's Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is currently in the process of finalizing two exemptions which will provide alternatives to the rules relating to aircraft rating flight reviews and instrument proficiency checks from July 1. The exemptions have been developed after extensive consultation with members of the aviation community. Flight reviews for the low-level, private IFR and night VFR operational ratings remain unchanged.

Flight reviews and instrument proficiency checks for type rated aircraft were introduced under Part 61. The new rules were designed to address the risks associated with the complexity and high performance characteristics of these aircraft, and the need to ensure pilots who operate them maintain their proficiency. These checks are also consistent with international better practice, although there are differences in how some countries manage the maintenance of pilot competency.

While the rationale for introducing additional checks was sound, CASA does recognise that the new rules have resulted in significant costs for a number of pilots. The upcoming changes are designed to reduce the burden these policies are having on some industry participants, while ensuring the safety risks continue to be effectively addressed.

Read below to find out what’s changing. If you are a pilot who was planning to undertake a flight review or instrument proficiency check between now and 1 July, you might decide to wait until the exemption is in force and the requirements are simpler.

Flight review changes

Under Part 61, pilots need to have a valid flight review for each aircraft rating. That means pilots flying a class-rated aircraft need to have a valid flight review for that class rating and, if the same pilot flies a type-rated aircraft, they need to have a valid flight review for that type rating.

The new exemption will simplify the flight review requirements, and for some pilots reduce the number of flight reviews they need to complete.  Pilots will only need to complete a flight review that was conducted in an aircraft of the same category within the previous two years. If it is a multi-engine aircraft, the flight review must have been done in a multi-engine aircraft of the same category. The flight review rules already recognise other activities that pilots complete such as flight tests, proficiency checks and certain training, all of which satisfy the flight review requirement. The same rules apply under the exemption.

For example, a pilot completing an instrument rating proficiency check in a multi-engine helicopter would have a valid flight review for all helicopters, without having to do a separate helicopter flight review in a single-engine class-rated helicopter (please note there no changes to the R22/R44 biennial flight review requirement).

Flight reviews for the low-level, private IFR and night VFR operational ratings remain unchanged.

Instrument proficiency check changes

Under Part 61, to exercise the privileges of an instrument rating, pilots need to have completed an instrument proficiency check (IPC) in the previous 12 months – regulation 61.880. To exercise the privileges of a pilot type-rating under the instrument flight rules (IFR), pilots need to have completed an IPC in an aircraft covered by the type-rating aircraft in the previous 24 months – regulation 61.805. For type-rated single-pilot turbojet aeroplanes, the IPC needs to have been done in an aircraft covered by the type-rating as a single-pilot operation in the previous 12 months.

The exemption doesn’t change the annual instrument rating IPC requirement when it comes into effect on 1 July.  Pilots still have to complete an annual IPC that was conducted in an aircraft of the same category, and to fly a multi-engine aircraft under the IFR, the IPC must have been done in a multi-engine aircraft of the same category.

However, under the exemption, instead of having a valid IPC for a type rating, pilots will only need to have completed an IPC in the previous 24 months that is relevant to the aircraft being flown. There are three safety criteria: whether the aircraft is type-rated, whether it is multi-crew certificated, and whether it is a turbojet aeroplane to be flown single-pilot.

Further information for the aviation community is currently being developed in preparation for both the flight review and instrument proficiency check changes, and will be available via the CASA website from 1 July. This will include revised information sheets, an updated CASR Part 61 Licence Instruction Guide and tables to help pilots determine which aircraft they should undertake their IPCs in.

(Source: CASA news release)

FMI: www.casa.gov.au

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC