Didn't We Do This Already? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Apr 23, 2004

Didn't We Do This Already?

AOPA To FAA: Don't Mandate Big N-Numbers

AOPA on Monday told the FAA to reject a petition from a group called Stop the Noise, asking for mandatory under-wing display of two-foot-high N numbers so aircraft could be more easily identified. AOPA told the FAA that requiring aircraft owners to put large N numbers on the undersides of their wings would serve no purpose and that the FAA has its own studies that already prove the point.

"The Stop the Noise petition is an argument that's already been made and lost," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "It's a transparent attempt by this group to have the FAA make it easier for Stop the Noise to sue pilots, something we strongly oppose."

"Our opposition to this proposal is based on a number of factors but focuses on the FAA's previous determination that larger registration numbers would not assist those on the ground in the identification of aircraft, as stated in the Stop the Noise proposal," wrote AOPA Director of Regulatory and Certification Policy Luis Gutierrez in formal comments on the petition.

Gutierrez also poked holes in the Stop the Noise argument that under-wing N numbers would aid in national security. Gutierrez reminded the FAA that the current requirement for 12-inch registration numbers is at the request of the Department of Defense. AOPA's comments also note that the under-wing ID would be "irrelevant" to military aircraft trying to intercept and identify a general aviation aircraft because "procedures outlined in the Aeronautical Information Manual do not provide for interception and identification from below."

Gutierrez also noted that the issue of the size of aircraft registration numbers has been around for at least 50 years. But he pointed out that as early as 1960, the FAA determined that "'unless the aircraft is flying at an appropriate altitude, attitude, and speed; the observer is located directly below the flight path; it is during daylight; and weather conditions are favorable, these marks are of little value in effecting positive ground-to-air identification.'"

Again in 1977, in response to another petition for under-wing N numbers, Gutierrez notes, the FAA said that the markings are useful for identification "only under ideal conditions."

"Nothing in their petition alters the FAA's earlier findings, so the agency should reject this request."

FMI: www.aopa.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC