Foam Didn't Concern Columbia Crew | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Wed, Jul 02, 2003

Foam Didn't Concern Columbia Crew

They Were Aware of Foam, Not of Any Danger

"Experts have reviewed the high speed photography and there is no concern for RCC or tile damage. We have seen the same phenomenon on several other flights and there is absolutely no concern for entry. That is all for now. It's a pleasure working with you every day."

That's one e-mail that Columbia's commander, Rick D. Husband, and pilot, William C. McCool (pictured) were happy to have received during the doomed shuttle's flight. It was written as part of then-private correspondence, by flight director "Steve" Stich. NASA explains that the correspondence wasn't "official."

The pilots liked it, though. Rick Husband replied two days later, again on a "personal" level, "Thanks a million, Steve! And thanks for the great work on your part."

Regardless Stich's happy note, NASA has since revealed that there was an ongoing debate on the ground, as to whether the foam collision could have precipitated a calamity.

The consensus was that, while the possibility was there, previous similar-looking contacts produced only minor damage; and certainly, the mission and the crew were not in any danger.

Later, NASA as much as said that, even if catastrophic damage had been suspected (it was not), there was little that could have been done, on that mission, to save the crew.

Later, NASA said that, had they really thought the safety of the crew were in danger, there might have been some herculean efforts that could have been employed. Some of those possible efforts are now being explored, as backups for future shuttle missions.

Columbia disintegrated February 1, 2003, on re-entry, at about 13,000 miles per hour, over Texas. All seven aboard were killed. Many e-mails, including previously-private correspondence, have been released to the site below.

FMI: www.jsc.nasa.gov/news/columbia/107_emails/foamemails.doc; www.caib.us

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.10.24): Takeoff Roll

Takeoff Roll The process whereby an aircraft is aligned with the runway centerline and the aircraft is moving with the intent to take off. For helicopters, this pertains to the act>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.10.24)

“We’re proud of the hard work that went into receiving this validation, and it will be a welcome relief to our customers in the European Union. We couldn’t be mor>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.11.24)

"Aircraft Spruce is pleased to announce the acquisition of the parts distribution operations of Wag-Aero. Wag-Aero was founded in the 1960’s by Dick and Bobbie Wagner in the >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.11.24): IDENT Feature

IDENT Feature The special feature in the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS) equipment. It is used to immediately distinguish one displayed beacon target from other be>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.11.24)

Aero Linx: Pararescue Air Force Pararescuemen, also known as PJs, are the only DoD elite combat forces specifically organized, trained, equipped, and postured to conduct full spect>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC