Report: On-Demand Carrier Fatalities Loom Over Excellent Industry Safety Numbers | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Mon, Jul 10, 2006

Report: On-Demand Carrier Fatalities Loom Over Excellent Industry Safety Numbers

Charter Ops Average 2.2 Accidents Per 100,000 Flight Hours, Says Paper

The FAA, NTSB and other agencies are quick to point out to all who will listen that, by the numbers, this is the safest time ever to fly -- with the last major crash involving a domestic airliner occuring in November 2001, when an American Airlines jet went down in Queens, NY.

However, the picture isn't as rosy when you consider another segment of the aviation picture -- on demand operators. Or, more specifically, small cargo aircraft -- the kind that fly small packages and check stubs throughout the country -- as well as air taxis, charter operators and EMS helicopters.

The Miami Herald reports that, on average... one of these aircraft have been involved in a fatal accident every month, from 2000 to 2004.

The private air cargo auditing group Robert E. Breiling Associates told the paper that in 2004 alone, small cargo planes averaged 2.2 crashes for every 100,000 hours of US operation -- compared to rates of 0.11 for corporate jets, 0.13 for scheduled air carriers, 0.90 for business travel and 1.51 for scheduled commuters.

Furthermore, these accidents are up to 50 times more likely to result in fatalities, according to the NTSB.  

Alas, the only category with a higher crash rate is general aviation -- whose accident rate is nearly three times higher.

The Herald does not go into detail on ways to solve this problem... but it cannot be argued that better training would go a long way towards bringing that rate down. Many on demand operators also fly older planes... with older systems and avionics, as opposed to the newer technologies found in more advanced aircraft.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.07.24): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.07.24)

Aero Linx: The T-6 Racing Association The T-6 Racing Association is all about T-6‘s and racing. Our mission is to bring great racing to our fans in Reno and other venues wher>[...]

Airborne 05.01.24: WACO Kitchen, FAA Reauthorization, World Skydiving Day

Also: Electra Aero, AMO-CBP v Smugglers, Naval King Airs, Boeing Deal To the surprise of everyone involved, Waco Kitchen shut down both airport operations with little warning and h>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.02.24: Bobby Bailey, SPRG Report Cards, Skydive!

Also: WACO Kitchen Bails, French SportPlane Mfr to FL, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Innovation Preview Bobby Bailey, a bit of a fixture in sport aviation circles for his work with>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC