Issues Include Cost, Liability

So... what's up with the much heralded "Registered Traveler" program, which was designed to give frequent fliers a way to skirt the tedium of airport security? Well... from the looks of it, nothing much.

Despite plans to incorporate the system at several high-traffic airports around the country, the St. Petersburg (FL) Times reports that so far Registered Traveler is only in effect at one -- Orlando International... and while the gateway to the land of Mickey has signed up more than 25,000 travelers over the last year for its privately-run "Clear" service, there is still no 'clear' indication when other airports will follow suit.

So... what's the hold up? Well, standardizing features and services of the programs offered by the three separate companies touting Registered Traveler is a big factor... as is some passengers' reluctance to pony up the $80 annual fee for the privilege of standing in a much shorter line to go through security.

And then there are the logistical issues... as many airports don't have the room to add a new security station for registered travelers. There is also some reluctance by airports to invest additional funds for, essentially, a perk for the select few.

But a primary concern, it seems, is liability: after all, if a terrorist happens to slip through a "Clear" line... who would be responsible? The airport? The company running the program?

No one knows yet... and until that question is firmly answered, registered traveler may be kept standing in line... despite the TSA's plans to implement the program in as many as 20 airports by the end of this year.

FMI: www.tsa.gov, www.flyclear.com