War Of Words Escalates Over KC-X Tanker Program | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Fri, Oct 30, 2009

War Of Words Escalates Over KC-X Tanker Program

International Association Of Machinists Blasts Northrup/EADS Bid

While the Air Force continues to wrestle with replacing it's aging fleet of KC-135 tankers, a war of words continues to get louder, with various factions hoping to slice off a piece of the multi-billion dollar program. Earlier in the week, lawmakers from four southern states announced an alliance who's stated initial purpose is to promote the Northrop Grumman/EADS tanker, which they say would be built largely on the U.S. Gulf Coast. Wednesday, General Vice President Richard Michalski of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers issued the following statement, which he said responds to recent statements by Northrop Grumman about its bid to win the Air Force's $35 billion tanker contract:

"EADS/Airbus is currently promoting its phantom tanker program around the world without Northrop Grumman. So here's the 'big why:' if Northrop Grumman is a full partner with EADS/Airbus on the tanker program, why aren't they being marketed around the world alongside the French company?

It turns out that the 'big why' is a big lie. EADS/Airbus is using Northrop Grumman as mere window dressing on its latest ploy to steal American jobs.

The Air Force has requested a tanker aircraft based on an existing commercial aircraft. Northrop has never built a single commercial aircraft, nor does it have the assembly lines or engineers needed to build one. Instead, EADS intends to propose its A330, which is made and maintained in Europe and is the product of what has been determined by the World Trade Organization to be an illegal subsidy campaign intended to steal U.S. jobs.

The so-called Northrop/EADS partnership on the tankers is little more than a press release. We need a fully transparent procurement process for the tanker replacement.

The first step would be to acknowledge that the A330 is an EADS/Airbus bid that is financed with European subsidies that the World Trade Organization has declared illegal."

FMI: www.goiam.org

Advertisement

More News

Bolen Gives Congress a Rare Thumbs-Up

Aviation Governance Secured...At Least For a While The National Business Aviation Association similarly applauded the passage of the FAA's recent reauthorization, contentedly recou>[...]

The SportPlane Resource Guide RETURNS!!!!

Emphasis On Growing The Future of Aviation Through Concentration on 'AFFORDABLE FLYERS' It's been a number of years since the Latest Edition of Jim Campbell's HUGE SportPlane Resou>[...]

Buying Sprees Continue: Textron eAviation Takes On Amazilia Aerospace

Amazilia Aerospace GmbH, Develops Digital Flight Control, Flight Guidance And Vehicle Management Systems Textron eAviation has acquired substantially all the assets of Amazilia Aer>[...]

Hawker 4000 Bizjets Gain Nav System, Data Link STC

Honeywell's Primus Brings New Tools and Niceties for Hawker Operators Hawker 4000 business jet operators have a new installation on the table, now that the FAA has granted an STC f>[...]

Echodyne Gets BVLOS Waiver for AiRanger Aircraft

Company Celebrates Niche-but-Important Advancement in Industry Standards Echodyne has announced full integration of its proprietary 'EchoFlight' radar into the e American Aerospace>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC