Obama Deficit Reduction Plan Hits Airlines For Increased Security Fees | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Sep 20, 2011

Obama Deficit Reduction Plan Hits Airlines For Increased Security Fees

Also Proposes Changes In The Way The Fees Are Collected

While business aviation took a huge hit in President Obama's proposal to reduce the federal deficit, airlines did not go unscathed either ... and it's a pretty sure bet that the fee increases imposed for airlines would be passed directly on to the passengers.

In the document released Monday by the OMB outlined the President's plan to "Live Within Our Means," the administration proposed to "Reform the Aviation Passenger Security Fee to more accurately reflect the costs of aviation security.

"Reflecting its commitment to keeping air travel and commerce safe, the Administration has invested heavily in personnel, technology, and infrastructure to mitigate the constantly-evolving risks to aviation security. As risk changes, however, so too must the way in which we fund our aviation security efforts. In 2001, the Aviation and Transportation Security Act created the Aviation Passenger Security Fee, which was to be collected to off¬set the costs of the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA’s) aviation security-related activities.

"The fee, in conjunction with a separate fee charged directly to air carriers, was put in place to ensure that the costs of aviation security were borne by the direct beneficiaries (e.g., air passengers, airlines) of aviation security services. The fee was originally intended to recover the full costs of aviation security. Since its establishment, however, the fee has been statutorily limited to $2.50 per passenger enplanement with a maximum fee of $5.00 per one-way trip. This recovers only 43 percent of TSA’s aviation security costs, which have risen over the years while the fee has remained the same.

"The Administration proposes both to raise the fee and change the manner in which it is collected.Modeled after Chairman Paul Ryan’s proposal in the House’s 2012 Concurrent Resolution on the Budget, the Administration’s proposal would:

  • Replace the current “per-enplanement” fee structure with a “per one-way trip” fee structure so that passengers pay the fee only one time when travelling to their destination.
  • Remove the current statutory fee limit and replace it with a statutory fee minimum of $5.00, with annual incremental increases of 50 cents from 2013 to 2017, resulting in a fee of $7.50 in 2017 and thereafter.
  • Allow the Secretary of Homeland Security to adjust the fee (to an amount equal to or greater than the new statutory fee minimum) through regulation when necessary.
  • Set aside a specific amount of fee revenue to be returned to the General Fund for deficit reduction over 10 years.

"The proposed fee would collect an estimated $8.8 billion in additional fee revenue over five years, and $24.9 billion over 10 years. The Administration’s proposal would direct $15 billion to be deposited into the General Fund for debt reduction, with any additional revenues in excess of this amount being applied as offsets to TSA’s discretionary appropriations."

Sounds like the Administration thinks that nearly anybody that flies should be paying more in some way. A major lobbying effort on behalf of business aviation is already underway, and it's fairly likely that airlines and consumer groups will get together to oppose this fee increase as well.

FMI: www.whitehouse.gov, www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/assets/jointcommitteereport.pdf
 

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC