CIA's Tiny 1970s UAV | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Wed, Oct 29, 2003

CIA's Tiny 1970s UAV

They Called it, Disguised it, as a Dragonfly

Tabassum Zakaria reports for Reuters that the CIA built and tested a dragonfly-sized UAV that was designed to carry a listening device short distances. The CIA says it never used it, and that its full mission is still secret.

The agency had a micro-mic and transmitter that the spooks thought was just the thing for listening to people who didn't want to be heard. We've all seen enough of those spy movies -- where spies meet on sidewalk cafes, because they don't trust their offices and hotel rooms -- to know that an insect-sized device would go unnoticed, at least until someone slapped it.

The original idea was to disguise the UAV as a bumblebee, but, as everyone knows, bumblebees aren't supposed to be able to fly... and the CIA's effort was proof of that theory. An entymologist suggested a much-better-designed six-legged flying machine -- a dragonfly -- as the perfect vehicle, and the CIA built one.

The thing flew, it is said, a bladder carrying liquid fuel of some sort. A watchmaker built the engine, which actually made the wings beat. A laser steered the little bug [get it? -- "bug" --ed.] at ranges that were, one would guess, measured in tens of feet.

The machine is on exhibit at the 40th anniversary of the CIA's Directorate of Science and Technology, but the public, naturally, can't get in.

The CIA says it never used the dragonfly-UAV, and that it built just the one. While a real dragonfly is used to coping with wind gusts, this machine simply couldn't. Whether today's technology could easily control the little "insectothopter" is a matter for speculation... inside the agency.

FMI: www.cia.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.30.24)

Aero Linx: Malibu M-Class Owners and Pilots Association (MMOPA) The Piper M-Class Owners & Pilots Association (PMOPA) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the interest>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC