Neil Armstrong's Famous Quote Was... Misquoted? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Oct 02, 2006

Neil Armstrong's Famous Quote Was... Misquoted?

An Aussie Computer Programmer Says Everybody Heard Wrong

Neil Armstrong made history both when he stepped off the Eagle onto the floor of the Moon's Sea of Tranquility, and when he made his oft-quoted "giant leap" statement.

According to Australian computer programmer Peter Shann Ford, Armstrong's famous utterance has been misquoted all these years.

As recorded in the history books, when Armstrong stepped off the lander he said, "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." He's maintained he thought he'd included the word "a" in front of man -- and if he didn't, he'd meant to.

That would have changed the statement to "That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind," making it both grammatically correct, and of course, much more dramatic.

Ford says he nabbed a copy of the original recording of Armstrong's 1969 transmission from NASA's website. Using a computer, he carefully analyzed the original recording and claims he found evidence of the missing word.

For his part, Armstrong, who has taken great pains to eschew celebrity since his history-making spaceflight and moon walk, continues to maintain he said "a man," but has quietly accepted the version printed and broadcast so many times since.

Armstrong told the Associated Press, "I have reviewed the data and Peter Ford's analysis of it, and I find the technology interesting and useful. I also find his conclusion persuasive. Persuasive is the appropriate word."

How truly remarkable that Armstrong, arguably one of the twentieth century's most recognized figures, feels no personal need to "correct" anything.

We're with you Neil. Let everyone argue about how you "said" it; they all know you're the one who "did" it. And we're fairly certain that part of history won't change!

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC