Potomac Airfield Responds To Shock Closure | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Nov 03, 2005

Potomac Airfield Responds To Shock Closure

Manager David Wartofsky Fires Back At TSA

Editor's Note: Yesterday, November 1st, the TSA slammed Potomac Airfield closed, with a brief and statement which we provided without further comment. Here is Potomac Airfield's response by manager David Wartofsky (below), which we'll run in the same manner.

We do not know the cause of this closure at this time. (The TSA statement did not make it clear). We are investigating and will comment soon. Take it away, David Wartofsky:


TSA WALKING AWAY FROM IMPROVED AIRSPACE SECURITY BY CLOSING POTOMAC AIRFIELD IN MARYLAND

Airspace security in the national capital area is provided by multiple agencies.  Rather than address the more significant long-standing problems, unfortunately in this case, TSA has chosen the least effective route.

To improve security overhead, instead of more effectively dealing with real airspace issues, which are addressed through operational security measures, TSA has chosen to lock a few aircraft on the ground; even more remarkably, aircraft only operated by pilots already cleared by TSA, The United States Secret Service, and other agencies.

Meanwhile TSA allows pilots having less secure procedures to continue to operate.

While Potomac Airfield has continually improved security, through improving plans approved by TSA, and by incorporating security measures already in place for other operators in the National Capital Area, TSA has withdrawn its approval for reasons that are not clear.

Potomac Airfield security plans have been developed in consultation with all relevant agencies responsible to enhance airspace security, including United States Secret Service, Customs, DOD, FAA, and others, yet TSA for some reason feels this is inadequate.

By TSA removing its approval, TSA has chosen to not support enhanced security.

In review of information provided by TSA and other agencies, no agency has identified any physical threat; particularly from the pilots already approved by TSA, USSS and others, who operate from the Potomac Airfield.

The procedures developed by Potomac Airfield, to more effectively screen and eliminate any real potential threat, go unnoticed by TSA.

TSA's current action is further evidence that TSA, in this instance, does not understand enhancing airspace security through more effective operational procedures.

TSA also does not understand the impact to legitimate private-sector users; shown by their similar efforts to 're-open' DCA to general aviation, as recently reported by the press.

Regardless, TSA continues to allow pilots not having assured in-cockpit control to operate, while grounding those pilots with the most effective operational security protocols.

Potomac understands that Congressional inquiries are under way considering TSA's handling of this particular matter.

Potomac also plans to request clarification from the Executive office about their sincerity in decisions post 911, to re-open national security airspace to legitimate private sector users.

Potomac understands that TSA's statutory authority is to coordinate with other government agencies.

It is not clear that TSA coordinated with any Executive agencies in this action.

FMI: www.potomac-airfield.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC