Arizona Town Looks To Limit UAV Use | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Fri, May 29, 2015

Arizona Town Looks To Limit UAV Use

Resident Recently Charged Despite No Law On The Books

A private investigator in Paradise Valley, AZ faces charges after flying his quadcopter over private property in the town, but he wasn't snooping for information for a client, he was reliving a moment in his own past.

The PI is Paul Huebl, according to a report from television station KSAZ. In the 80s, Huebl was forced to defend himself while confronting a man who lived in the home at the time, and shot and injured him. He was acquitted of any crime in connection with the incident.

Last summer, he went back with his UAV to take video of the property where the incident occurred ... and was confronted by the current owner. According to Huebl's attorney David Appleton, he landed the aircraft, gave the woman his card, explained what he was doing, and left.

She called 911, but was told that there were no laws preventing Huebl from capturing the images.

Now the city council has drafted an ordinance that would allow UAVs only to be used with a permit from the police department that would be issued on a one-time case-by-case basis. The operator would have to pay processing fees and notify a property owner that he or she was going to fly the aircraft over the property. It carries a maximum penalty of $2,500 or six months in jail for each offence. It does make an exception for recreational use of a UAV on the owner's private property as long as the aircraft stays below 100 feet.

Huebl, meanwhile, has been charged with careless or reckless aircraft operation. Appleton says the charge is "trumped up," and says that the ordinance under consideration is "unenforceable," adding that the city council is likely "inviting litigation to challenge the ordinance." Appleton said that pending federal regulations for UAV use will supersede any law that the town might pass.

The ordinance was on the agenda for discussion Thursday. A vote could come at the next meeting in two weeks.

(Image from file)

FMI: Proposed Ordinance

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC