Tax Proposed On Aviation In Connecticut Which Could Severely Affect GA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Wed, Mar 16, 2011

Tax Proposed On Aviation In Connecticut Which Could Severely Affect GA

Repeals Exemption For Aircraft Parts And Maintenance, Assesses Personal Property Tax

Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy (D) released his budget proposal on February 17, 2011, which includes a provision impacting aviation in the state. The proposal would repeal the current tax exemption for aircraft parts and maintenance on aircraft under 6,000 pounds and assess personal property tax on aircraft.  House Bill 6387, if passed, would tax aircraft at 70% of their value factored by a millage rate of 20. Millage is defined as one dollar for every $1,000 of assessed value.  For example, a corporate jet valued at $20 million would be assessed an annual tax of $280,000.  It appears that there is no weight limit associated with this proposal, meaning all aircraft in the state would be impacted.


Governor Dan Malloy

The Connecticut House of Representatives Committee on Finance is expected to convene within the next few days to begin work on this and other bills. 

NATA is urging its members who have an interest in the state of Connecticut to respond to this call to action immediately. Contact the governor's office and elected representatives in Connecticut to voice your opposition.  

NATA says when talking to legislators, the following points should be made:

  • Surrounding states, Maine, Rhode Island, New Jersey, and New York, do not impose personal property taxes on aircraft.  Therefore, because aircraft are mobile assets, owners, especially corporate owners, are likely to reestablish their aircraft in one of those states.
  • Airports and airport-based businesses will lose revenue from loss of fuel, hangar and maintenance purchases. 
  • Aerospace and aviation provide 45,800 jobs, resulting in a $2.77 billion payroll to the state.
  • This tax proposal will result in a significant loss of jobs and revenue as aircraft owners seek to avoid this onerous tax proposal.

NATA strongly encourages its members to be outspoken in opposition to HB 6387. The association has worked with its members in various states and has defeated similar budget proposals, but says your immediate action is required.

FMI: www.nata.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC