Thu, Apr 26, 2007
USAF Versus Army, Navy And Marines
A turf battle of sorts has broken out among the US armed forces,
over whether the Air Force should take the lead in development of
all unmanned aerial vehicles used above 3,500 feet. What started as
a beef between the Air Force and the Army, has now been joined by
the Navy and Marine Corps.
The Air Force has UAVs that come in three flavors: The Predator,
a larger craft called the Reaper (shown above), and the Global
Hawk, bigger still. The Army rejected all three, wanting an armed
UAV which fell between the capabilities of Reaper and Global Hawk.
The Army calls its variant the Warrior, and wants to spend a
billion dollars to buy 132 of them.
The Air Force contends it should oversee all high-altitude UAV
programs, in the interest of efficiency. The Navy and Marines are
backing the Army's call for autonomy in defining UAV missions and
In Congress, Hawaii Democrat Representative Neil Abercrombie has
threatened to make an arbitrary decision for the services, if they
can't work things out.
"Who's in charge? Where is the authority?" Abercrombie asked
during a recent hearing with officers, colonels and experts from
the Government Accountability Office, reports the Army Times.
Time will tell...
AD NUMBER: 2013-15-06 PRODUCT: Certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and –315 airplanes.>[...]
AD NUMBER: 2013-26-05 PRODUCT: All Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes; and Model MYSTERE->[...]
Learn to Fly Blog This blog features writings by aviation authors and flight instructors.>[...]
A turn executed by the aircraft during the initial approach between the end of the outbound track and the beginning of the intermediate or final approach track.>[...]
“In the near future, general aviation manufacturers will be able to certify their products more efficiently and effectively, meaning more safety in more airplanes.” Sou>[...]