Pending Federal Bill Would Require Rejustification Of ADIZ | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** Airborne 11.24.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.24.14 **
** Airborne 11.21.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.21.14 **
** Airborne 11.19.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.19.14 **

Sat, Aug 16, 2003

Pending Federal Bill Would Require Rejustification Of ADIZ

Legislation To Be Considered After Recess

Congress stands ready to make security officials explain the continuing need for the Baltimore-Washington Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) when it returns from its summer recess after Labor Day. Included in the FAA Reauthorization bill is AOPA-backed language that requires the secretary of Transportation to report every 60 days on why the ADIZ is still needed and what steps the FAA is taking to smooth operations within the zone.

"We've used this tactic before," said AOPA Senior Vice President of Government and Technical Affairs Andy Cebula. "At the end of 2001, some three months after the September 11 terrorist attacks, similar language requiring the government to justify the continuing existence of enhanced Class B airspace led to its eventual removal.

"Without a specific and credible threat, the ADIZ has outlived its wartime need," Cebula continued. "For over a year, the 15-nm Special Flight Rule Area (SFRA) around the Washington Monument provided adequate protection for the nation's capital from any generalized terrorist threat. All the ADIZ does is create excessive workload for air traffic controllers, foment aggravation, if not outright anger, among pilots, and cost taxpayers millions of dollars to enforce."

AOPA has been collecting anecdotal evidence of problems caused by the ADIZ and its increasingly common cousin, the 30-nm Presidential movement temporary flight restriction (TFR).

One of the most disturbing stories came from a medevac helicopter pilot who operates in the ADIZ. "We have discrete transponder codes, so only an initial radio contact is necessary. However, we have had numerous problems with the initial contact. On this date, I had to circle two minutes over the hospital I lifted off from with a patient on board. It delayed precious minutes for this patient."

"It stands to reason that if a patient is being transported by helicopter, time is of the essence," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "If the ADIZ system can't even accommodate approved and medically necessary flight operations, then something is terribly wrong."

Another pilot told AOPA that he had to explain to a flight service station briefer outside the Baltimore-Washington area how to file an ADIZ flight plan. Other pilots tell of being stuck either on the ground waiting to take off or in the air waiting to land while air traffic controllers tried to deal with the crush of VFR traffic the system was never designed to handle. One pilot put it succinctly: "Total time on fone 25 minutes. Total time for actual flight 25 minutes" [original emphasis].

With President Bush now on the road campaigning both for his legislative agenda and for reelection, more and more of the country is getting a taste of what the ADIZ is like with the frequent 30-nm Presidential TFRs that precede the President's arrival.

Following the President's recent trips to Dallas and Houston, AOPA received numerous comments from pilots who talked about overwhelmed flight service stations and frustrated pilots giving up and going home. But the TFR also hit businesses hard. "I work at a local fight school and pilot shop as dispatcher/store manager," said one instrument-rated pilot. "President Bush's visit to Dallas closed us down from 1 p.m. through the rest of our business hours. Our estimated lost revenue just from flights we had to cancel was in excess of $3,000. To a small flight school, this is a big blow."

"No one, least of all AOPA or pilots, is suggesting that the government should not take action to prevent terrorism or protect the President," said Boyer. "But just because you can impose or continue security-related flight restrictions doesn't address the question of whether you should.

"The ADIZ justification language in the FAA Reauthorization bill will force security officials to step back and take a critical look at the need for the restriction. And hopefully, it will make the same officials rethink the need for the huge Presidential TFRs."

Ed's note: Consider the FAA's dilemma over what to do about protecting candidates on road trips in the coming election year...

FMI: www.aopa.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.26.14)

FAA Aviation Safety Information Analysis And Sharing System (ASIAS) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) promotes the open exchange of safety information in order to continuou>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.26.14): Density Altitude

Pressure altitude corrected for nonstandard temperature. Density altitude is used in computing the performance of an aircraft and its engines.>[...]

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (11.26.14)

“We hope to never see an event like this again, but, we must be prepared." Source: FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, on the release of the agency's 30 report on the fire at t>[...]

ANN FAQ: It's Alive! ANN REALTIME NewsBug Headlines for YOUR Desktop!

It's For Real! ANN REALTIME NewsBug Released To ANN Readers, Worldwide For those of you using a windows PC (MAC version in the works... we promise), a new REALTIME News Service fro>[...]

Helicopters Still Flying Tourists Over Hudson River

But Activists Continue To Call For A Ban On The Flights A group of activists in New York and New Jersey are still working to have sightseeing flights over New York City and the Hud>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2014 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC