Comair Sues FAA For Negligence In Comair 5191 Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 08.24.15

Airborne 08.25.15

Airborne 08.26.15

Airborne 08.27.15

Airborne 08.21.15

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 08.24.15

Airborne 08.25.15

Airborne 08.26.15

Airborne 08.27.15

Airborne 08.21.15

EAA/ANN AirVenture Innovation Preview

AIP-#1 Vimeo

AIP-#2 Vimeo

AIP-Part 1 YouTube

AIP-Part 2 YouTube

Fri, Feb 23, 2007

Comair Sues FAA For Negligence In Comair 5191 Accident

Earlier Lawsuit Dismissed By Court

On Thursday, Comair officially sued the Federal Aviation Administration for negligence in the August 27 takeoff crash of a CRJ100 from Blue Grass Airport in Lexington, KY.

The Lexington Herald-Leader states Comair claims the FAA should have had two controllers in the tower when the plane attempted takeoff from the shorter of two runways at the airport. The lone controller on duty at the time of the accident had turned away to perform administrative tasks, and did not see the commuter jet take the incorrect runway. Comair also notes that controller had only two hours of sleep since his previous shift.

As Aero-News reported, 49 of the 50 persons onboard the CRJ died in the resulting crash. An initial investigation showed the plane may have briefly become airborne in the final seconds before the plane left the runway, but was not able to clear terrain. The airliner impacted a field off the departure end of runway 26.

That runway is half the length of the 7,000-foot runway 22, the runway 5191 had been cleared to depart from.

In related news, the US District Court in Lexington denied a claim filed by Comair last October, seeking damages from the FAA. It that lawsuit, Comair claimed the agency should repay the airline $18 million for the loss of the CRJ, as well as for lawsuits filed against the airline in the crash.

Comair is appealing that decision, as well as a second dismissal related to an earlier lawsuit claiming the FAA did not properly inspect and approve construction along the main taxiway at Blue Grass Airport.

Comair had claimed construction along the taxiway -- which leads to both the accident runway, and the longer, correct runway -- may have contributed to confusion in the cockpit of Comair 5191, and directed the pilots to the wrong runway.

FMI: www.comair.com, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 08.26.15: New U-2?, Carter PAV Update, AK TFR Concerns

Also: Skydive Mid-Air, Classic Aero-TV, United Airlines, Forest Service Policy v Helicopters, WestJet Pilots' Association, NASA Drops Plane, Flightnow in Court Is it possible that >[...]

AD: Airbus Helicopters

AD NUMBER: 2015-17-11 PRODUCT: Airbus Helicopters Model AS350B, AS350BA, AS350B1, AS350B2, AS350B3, AS350C, AS350D, AS350D1, AS355E, AS355F, AS355F1, AS355F2, AS355N, AS355NP, EC13>[...]

AD: Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AD NUMBER: 2015-17-05 PRODUCT: Certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-700-1A10 and BD-700-1A11 airplanes.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (08.27.15)

The Ejection Site The goal is to educate and entertain people of all interests with details on one of the most interesting fields of engineering.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (08.27.15): Heading Hold

This describes a type of Gyro which senses rotation, and maintains direction. This is accomplished by sensing the rate of motion, and the time of motion, then compensating for the >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2015 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC