Britain Bans Passengers From Flights Who Refuse Full Body Scans | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 03.23.15

Airborne 03.24.15

Airborne 03.25.15

Airborne 03.26.15

Airborne 03.27.15

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 03.23.15

Airborne 03.24.15

Airborne 03.25.15

Airborne 03.26.15

Airborne 03.27.15

Wed, Feb 03, 2010

Britain Bans Passengers From Flights Who Refuse Full Body Scans

Airports Introducing Body Scan Technology This Week

Passengers boarding commercial airliners at Heathrow and Manchester airports who refuse to submit to a full-body scan will not be allowed to get on the airplanes following deployment of the technology at those two airports Monday. Civil liberty and privacy groups have criticized the scanners since their proposal as being an invasion of privacy.

The London Daily Mail reports that Transport Secretary Lord Adonis said "In the immediate future, only a small proportion of airline passengers will be selected for scanning. If a passenger is selected for scanning and declines, they will not be permitted to fly." Officials said the restriction of scanning those under 18 years of age had also been removed. 

The stepped-up implementation of the scanners follows the attempted bombing of a Northwest Airlines flight on Christmas day. The person accused of attempting to bring down the airliner boarded a plane bound for Detroit in Amsterdam.

The scanners have been under evaluation at Manchesters' terminal two for some time, and that will be where they are first being used under the new rules. They are expected to be installed in terminals one and three in the near future. BAA, which operates Heathrow airport, would not tell the paper how many scanners are in use, or where they will be deployed in the airport.

Airport officials continue to say that the scanners do not invade privacy, that the machine operator never sees the image, and that the images can not be stored or transmitted, though a recent report indicates there is a setting on the machines that can allow the storage and transmittal of the scans.

FMI: www.dft.gov.uk

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 03.27.15: Cockpit Changes Announced, Maine v UAVs, NBAA v Santa Monica

Also: AirVenture Update, Barnstorming Opines On Media Aero-Reporting, NTSB Update, ERAU Scholarships, Doolittle Raiders, Tecnam P2010 The loss of Germanwings Flight 9525 due to wha>[...]

IFALPA Strongly Condemns Leaking Of Germanwings CVR Data

Calls Release Of Early Data A 'Breach Of Trust' The International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations (IFALPA) deplores and condemns the leaking of certain elements o>[...]

Airborne 03.27.15: Cockpit Changes Announced, Maine v UAVs, NBAA v Santa Monica

Also: AirVenture Update, Barnstorming Opines On Media Aero-Reporting, NTSB Update, ERAU Scholarships, Doolittle Raiders, Tecnam P2010 The loss of Germanwings Flight 9525 due to wha>[...]

Airborne 03.26.15: Airbus Crash 'Pilot Induced', B-29 Rollout, CC Rockets Ready

Also: ALPA v UAVs, Aero-Community Update: XPrize, FAA Streamlines UAS COAs, Airport Infrastructure, ATC Reform, New SpaceX Rocket Data retrieved from the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CV>[...]

Summerville, SC Makes Flowertown Festival A UAV No-Fly Zone

Violation Could Land UAV Operator In Jail The town of Summerville, SC has declared its annual Flowertown Festival a no-fly zone for UAVs.>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2015 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC