Family Of Skydiver Lost In Sullivan Accident Sues | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Aug 04, 2006

Family Of Skydiver Lost In Sullivan Accident Sues

Says P&W, Skydiving Company, Airport Responsible For Daughter's Death

The National Transportation Safety Board has yet to issue its preliminary report on last Saturday's accident involving a skydiving plane near Sullivan, MO... but that doesn't mean the lawyers are waiting to assign blame.

The parents of Victoria Delacroix, 22 -- who perished in the accident, along with five others -- filed a lawsuit Thursday claiming negligence led one of the DeHavilland DHC-6's engines to fail, leading to the accident.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports Vivian and Susan Delacroix of Kent, England, are suing engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney; Quantum Leap Skydiving Center; Adventure Aviation, owner of the accident aircraft; and Sullivan Regional Airport, which serviced the plane -- saying all are responsible for the death of their daughter.

"Our initial investigation points to a right engine failure just after takeoff," said Gary C. Robb, a Kansas City attorney representing the family. Witnesses say the plane's right engine burst into flames moments after the plane took off, Robb added.

As Aero-News reported, the DHC-6 went down in a residential area shortly after takeoff from the airport on a planned skydiving mission. There were only two survivors of the accident.

Calls by the Post-Dispatch to Quantum Leap and the city of Sullivan -- which owns the airport -- were not returned. A spokesperson with Pratt & Whitney also declined to comment, stating it corporate policy not to discuss incidents still under investigation.

Robb, apparently, does not share that sentiment.

"There were some of the most experienced skydivers in the world on that plane, and not even they could jump from that altitude," Robb said.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC