Major to Face Dereliction-Of-Duty Charges | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jul 02, 2003

Major to Face Dereliction-Of-Duty Charges

It's Not Homicide, Manslaughter, or Assault; But It's Serious

Maj. Harry Schmidt, 37, could get six months in prison, if he is convicted of dereliction of duty, charges that remain after a Monday court martial hearing by the Air Force.

Schmidt was flying an F-16, and was one of two pilots who dropped bombs on what the pair thought were hostile troops, in Afghanistan, on April 17, 2002. The troops were Canadians, engaged in an exercise. Four died; another dozen were injured.

Maj. William Umbach, the mission commander, asked for early retirement. He was repremanded and allowed to retire; all charges against him were dropped.

Schmidt says he doesn't think he is guilty, and preferred a court martial -- even on homicide charges, which were a possibility at the time -- to an administrative punishment, where he maintained he couldn't get fair treatment. If convicted of dereliction of duty, he could spend half a year in prison.

Schmidt says he was given no indication that friendlies were conducting exercises in the area where he dropped his bomb. His lawyer says that the Air Force's earlier musings about homicide charges may have been a bluff. The decision to proceed on only the dereliction charge, "reinforces the fact that Harry didn't act criminally and shouldn't have been charged criminally," he said.

The more-serious charges haven't been dropped; if Schmidt wins the first round, they could be reinstated.

That scenario, though possible, is considered a long shot.

FMI: www.af.mil; www.centcom.mil/CENTCOMNews/Reports/Tarnak_Farms_Report.htm

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC