Wed, Apr 23, 2003
Tuesday, AOPA asked a federal judge in Michigan to
issue a summary judgment in the association's lawsuit against the
state's pilot background check law. "The state of Michigan does not
dispute the facts of this case," said AOPA Counsel Kathy Yodice.
"All that remains is for the court to decide whether or not, as
AOPA contends, federal law preempts the state's background check
law under the U.S Constitution's Supremacy Clause (Article VI,
clause 2). Today's motion asks the judge to proceed straight to his
ruling."
Both the FAA and the Transportation Security Administration have
written letters supporting AOPA's position. In its filing, AOPA
argues that the Michigan law is preempted both because of the
pervasiveness of federal regulation in aviation safety and security
matters as well as setting pilot eligibility standards, and because
the state law conflicts with federal efforts to create a uniform
national standard.
Citing numerous sections of the U.S. Code, AOPA
argues, "Congress clearly mandated that the FAA consider national
security in carrying out its functions, creating a 'culture' of
security consideration. Many of the safety functions of the FAA
inherently contain an element of aviation security and national
security. Thus, there is a general scheme placing the
responsibility for aviation security regulation, for the purposes
of national security and safety, in the federal government's
exclusive domain.
"The FAA is no longer the only agency responsible for aviation
security. Congress vested sweeping authority over security in the
TSA. "Together with the explicit and vast law of Congress governing
aviation security, the TSA's and the FAA's exercise of their
security powers occupy the field of aviation security. Thus, states
have no room to maneuver in that field."
AOPA's motion concludes, "To date, the intent of
the United States Congress and the authority conferred on the U.S.
Government Agencies remains manifest that aviation security is
exclusively a federal government responsibility, so that a uniform,
appropriate system can be maintained nationwide. ... For all of the
reasons presented to this Court, AOPA respectfully requests that
this Court grant the attached Motion for Summary Judgment."
More News
"As previously announced on February 29th, our IM-1 mission ended seven days after landing, as Odysseus' mission was not intended to survive the harsh temperatures of the lunar nig>[...]
Marker Beacon An electronic navigation facility transmitting a 75 MHz vertical fan or boneshaped radiation pattern. Marker beacons are identified by their modulation frequency and >[...]
Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]
Also: Moron With A Laser, EAA Aviation Museum, FAA v Santa Monica Propeller Service, Frontier MEC Lauds FO Boom Supersonic has confirmed details surrounding the successful first te>[...]
We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]