AOPA: Part 77 Obstruction Rules Could Negatively Impact GA Airports | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Sep 25, 2006

AOPA: Part 77 Obstruction Rules Could Negatively Impact GA Airports

Recommends Different Guidelines For Smaller Fields

A series of proposed updates to the FAA's airspace protection regulations, as defined under Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, has mostly met with approval from the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association... but that's not to say AOPA doesn't have some additional suggestions to protect smaller general aviation airports.

"AOPA generally supports the changes the FAA has proposed, but there are some things that might have a negative affect on GA airports," said Heidi Williams, AOPA director of air traffic services. "We're asking for additional analysis before the rule changes become final."

Of most concern, according to AOPA, is a proposal to expand the "imaginary primary surface" at many GA airports with nonprecision instrument approaches. The problem with that plan -- which, essentially, limits obstructions in a protected area surrounding the runway -- is that it would decrease the amount of land available for taxiways, aprons, and hangars.

AOPA also says the obstruction limits could also prevent smaller airports from making any such improvements -- because they wouldn't have enough space under the proposed rules. Existing structures could also be affected -- because facilities that were once an acceptable distances away from the runway, might now be labeled "obstructions" under the new rules.

AOPA called for the FAA to conduct additional analysis before implementing the rule changes.

"Simply put, smaller GA airports cannot comply financially with the same standards applicable at larger hub airports," said the pilot advocacy group.

AOPA also recommends the FAA reduce its obstruction standard from 499 feet to 400 feet above the surface. AOPA says would allow for safer operations for airspace users flying at the 500-foot minimum safe altitude in uncongested areas.

Other proposals made for Part 77 met with AOPA's approval -- such as a measure codifying the electromagnetic interference obstruction standards to better protect aviation communication and navigation radio transmissions.

The proposal to add obstruction protection for private-use airports with approved instrument approach procedures also met with AOPA's approval, along with increasing the advance warning period for construction of or alteration to an obstructing structure from 30 to 60 days.

FMI: www.aopa.org, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC