Honolulu Aerial Advertising Ban Contested | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Nov 29, 2005

Honolulu Aerial Advertising Ban Contested

Pro-Life Group Cites First Amendment Rights

A 9th Circuit Federal Appeals Court panel is considering a case over a 2002 city ban on aerial banner advertising, after an anti-abortion group questioned the legitimacy of such a ban under the group's First Amendment rights. At issue is the right of the state to grant counties the authority to govern what is displayed within their airspace.

Robert Muise, attorney for the California-based Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, says the ban violates federal law and infringes on the group's First Amendment right of free expression. The group is asking to be allowed to fly aerial banners depicting aborted human fetuses above Honolulu beaches.

Current regulations give Hawaiian counties the authority to ban displays in airspace or waters beyond county boundaries if they are visible from any public place. A federal judge upheld the city's ban last November, and Governor Linda Lingle bolstered the bill further in July by signing the bill in question, giving counties the authority to ban displays in airspace, or waters beyond county boundaries, if they are visible from any public place.

Federal law allows such advertising, although up until 2002 the FAA also stated as a provision that planes flying lower than 1,000 feet AGL must "understand and obey local and state ordinances that may prohibit or restrict banner tow operations" -- a provision that was cited in the original ruling.

After the ruling was made, the FAA removed the provision -- as the agency "wanted to make it perfectly clear that the FAA still retained sole authority over airspace," according to an FAA spokesman.

According to Muise, the group has flown such banners above 19 states, and Honolulu is the only city that prohibits the activities. Muise maintains that the way the law is currently written -- with the original provision struck -- the federal government has final say over what can be displayed.

City officials have stated if the ban is overruled in the courts, they will seek federal legislation to keep the skies over Honolulu free of "offensive" images.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.21.24)

Aero Linx: JAARS, Inc. For decades now, we’ve landed planes on narrow rivers and towering mountains. We’ve outfitted boats and vehicles to reach villages that rarely se>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC