NTSB: ATC Procedures Contributed To Fatal MU-2 Crash | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 04, 2007

NTSB: ATC Procedures Contributed To Fatal MU-2 Crash

Pilot Received Warning Of Low-Altitude Too Late

The NTSB says the August 2005 crash of Mitsubishi MU-2 while attempting a night approach to Centennial Airport (APA), near Denver, CO was the result of controlled flight into terrain.

The commercially-rated pilot, Sam Hunter, was attempting the ILS Rwy 35R approach during night IMC. Hunter received radar vectors to final and a clearance to maintain 8,000 feet MSL until established on the localizer.

When four miles from the final approach fix, he was passed off to Centennial Tower. At 02:04:46 he attempted to contact the tower but received no response. His second attempt 30 seconds later was successful and he received a clearance to land. The pilot's acknowledgement of his landing clearance was the last recorded communication from the aircraft.

Radar data reveals the aircraft steadily descending below the glidepath while tracking the localizer inbound.

At 02:06:40 the tower controller alerted the pilot to ""...check altitude...your altitude indicates six thousand four hundred...you appear to be well below the glide slope." The pilot did not respond. The tower controller then made several attempts to contact the pilot but there was no response.

The last radar return shows the aircraft approximately four miles south of the landing threshold at 6,400 MSL holding 140 knots groundspeed. The aircraft crashed at night in a remote area -- there were no witnesses.

Weather reported at 02:11, was wind from 010 degrees at 7 knots, visibility 3 statute miles, rain, mist, scattered clouds at 700 feet, broken clouds at 1,200 feet, overcast at 2,200 feet, temperature 15 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 14 degrees Fahrenheit, and a barometric pressure setting of 30.38 inches of Mercury. The tower visibility was reported as 4 statute miles.

A reconstruction of the accident sequence revealed Hunter began descending below the glideslope on the ILS after his hand off to the tower -- while he was still eight miles from the runway. At 02:05:37, the Denver TRACON Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW) visual alert and aural alarm activated for about 5 seconds and again from 02:06:00 until terrain impact about 42 seconds later. The airplane was about 7.2 and 6.3 nm from the airport, respectively, when the MSAW alerts at Denver TRACON activated.

Because of the MSAW software configuration at Denver TRACON, Centennial Tower was not eligible to receive aural MSAW alarms for any aircraft more than 5 nm from the airport. As a result, the controller at Centennial Tower only received visual alerts until the aircraft reached 5 nm from the airport. Tower controllers are not encouraged to actively monitor the visual display as their attention should be primarily outside the cab on the runway environment.

When the airplane reached a point 5 nm from Centennial Airport at 0206:35, the ongoing MSAW alarm generating a visual alert on the tower display then triggered the aural alarm in the tower. The tower controller immediately transmitted a low altitude alert to the pilot, but the airplane impacted terrain within seconds.

A previous FAA order had relieved the TRACON of any responsibility to transmit an MSAW alert for approaching aircraft once handed off to the tower. The radar controller stated she thought the tower MSAW alarm extended to 10 miles out.

The NTSB determined the probable cause of the accident to be the pilot’s failure to fly a stabilized instrument approach at night which resulted in controlled flight into terrain. Contributing factors were the dark night, low clouds, the inadequate design and function of the airport facility’s Minimum Safe Altitude Warning System (MSAW), and the FAA’s inadequate procedure for updating information to ATC controllers.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.16.24)

Aero Linx: International Business Aviation Council Ltd IBAC promotes the growth of business aviation, benefiting all sectors of the industry and all regions of the world. As a non->[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.16.24)

"During the annual inspection of the B-24 “Diamond Lil” this off-season, we made the determination that 'Lil' needs some new feathers. Due to weathering, the cloth-cove>[...]

Airborne 04.10.24: SnF24!, A50 Heritage Reveal, HeliCycle!, Montaer MC-01

Also: Bushcat Woes, Hummingbird 300 SL 4-Seat Heli Kit, Carbon Cub UL The newest Junkers is a faithful recreation that mates a 7-cylinder Verner radial engine to the airframe offer>[...]

Airborne 04.12.24: SnF24!, G100UL Is Here, Holy Micro, Plane Tags

Also: Seaplane Pilots Association, Rotax 916’s First Year, Gene Conrad After a decade and a half of struggling with the FAA and other aero-politics, G100UL is in production a>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.17.24: Feds Need Controllers, Spirit Delay, Redbird

Also: Martha King Scholarship, Montaer Grows, Textron Updates Pistons, FlySto The FAA is hiring thousands of air traffic controllers, but the window to apply will only be open for >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC