Local Governments Eye Wichita's Subsidy Battle With FAA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date






Airborne On ANN

Airborne 10.17.16

Airborne 10.18.16

Airborne 10.19.16

Airborne 10.20.16

Airborne 10.21.16

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 10.17.16

Airborne 10.18.16

Airborne 10.19.16

Airborne 10.20.16

Airborne 10.21.16

Wed, Apr 27, 2005

Local Governments Eye Wichita's Subsidy Battle With FAA

Cities, Airports Coast-To-Coast Eyeing The Concept Of Paying An Airline To Fly Into Town

All across America, local governments and airports alike are keeping close tabs on Wichita's battle with the FAA over the city's multimillion dollar subsidies to AirTran. In the meantime, the clock is ticking on a 30-day deadline under which the FAA has ordered Wichita to "remedy" the situation.

As ANN reported earlier this month, the FAA sent Wichita city leaders a six-page letter saying the $7 million they've spent to subsidize AirTran's daily service to Atlanta. Wichita calls that good business sense -- lowering fares for thousands of passengers. But the FAA calls it "unjust discrimination," saying the city favoring of one airline over another.

City officials say the subsidies don't come from Mid-Continent Airport, but from Wichita itself. The FAA counters that, since the Airport Authority Board was disbanded by the City Council in 1999, the council itself runs the airport. While the City Council does make all airport-related decisions, lawmakers say they do so under a banner separate from the council itself.

"The water has been muddied quite a bit by the FAA's position on Wichita," said Mike Boggs, at Meade & Hunt. He was quoted by the Wichita Eagle.

The venerable Wichita paper reports it's not unusual for local governments to pay airlines for serving their markets.

"I'm trying to think of an airport where it hasn't happened," Darryl Jenkins, visiting professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, FL, told the Eagle. "Without that, you would not have any low-cost service in a lot of markets."

But the FAA's problem seems to center on an airport entity favoring one carrier over another. The agency has threatened Wichita's federal airport grants are at stake. We're talking millions of dollars here.

"It's premature to talk about any sanctions or action that might or might not be taken under the compliance process since the city still hasn't explained its most recent action to us," FAA spokesman Paul Turk told the Wichita paper.

FMI: www.wichita.gov/Government


More News

Airborne 10.21.16: NIMBYs Out Of Control, SMO Evictions On Hold, New Race Class

Also: CVR/FDR Expansion, Focusing On Santa Monica, NASAO Boss, GE9X Engine, 1000th H-60M, Verizon Drones, New LAS ATC A Transportation Safety Board of Canada team is currently inve>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.23.16)

Aero-News Quote of the Day "Think of this transition as changing an engine on a plane when it's inflight. Rolling out STARS in our nation's busiest airspaces, without disrupting ai>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.23.16)

Aero Linx: The Society of United States Air Force Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFFS) SoUSAFFS was established in 1960 to more specifically support the USAF FS than AsMA at large could. Sin>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.23.16): Final Approach Point

Final Approach Point The point, applicable only to a nonprecision approach with no depicted FAF (such as an on airport VOR), where the aircraft is established inbound on the final >[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN!>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus





© 2007 - 2016 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC