Army Wants FAA To Retask Doppler Sites | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Apr 30, 2004

Army Wants FAA To Retask Doppler Sites

Brass Wants Them To Search For Aerosol Attacks

The Army believes we already have the elements of a biochemical weapons detection system up and running in the US -- the FAA's Doppler radar network.

Testing got underway last year, but the Army's project leader, Arne Johnson, isn't saying much about it. "They show the radar does have the capability of this type of event detection," is about all he'll tell reporters. But he will say that he's confident retasking Doppler radars will provide an effective early warning system in the event of an biological or chemical attack where agents are released from aircraft.

So far, Congress has authorized $15 million to develop the existing Doppler radar net into the Homeland Defense Chemical Biological Umbrella.

When it's up and running, the Army's system will eventually use 45 sites set up by the FAA to monitor airport windshear to identify the release of aerosol agents, then track the poisonous cloud to help emergency responders better prepare.

But while Johnson is confident the system will work, other experts aren't so sure. Dr. Tara O'Toole, who runs the Center for Biosecurity at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, is worried about the tremendous drain on resources that such a detection system would require.

"You get a lot of false positives if you're monitoring the area 24 hours a day, seven days a week," she said. "Each of those false alarms uses up a lot of resources."

Retired Lt. Gen. William Odom (USA) agrees. "Proving that this is technically feasible is the first step. Whether it's financially practical is another question," he said.

The Army already has a testing program in place, involving five sites in the Midwest. Last year, the military sprayed a concoction of water and polyethylene glycol on crops in Oklahoma. Another release is scheduled for next month.

FMI: www.army.mil, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC