DOT Investigates Unrealistic Airline Schedules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Apr 24, 2007

DOT Investigates Unrealistic Airline Schedules

Actual Arrival Times May Vary... A Lot

It may be hard to believe... but several domestic airlines are publishing flight schedules the carriers know to be, at best, dazzlingly optimistic... and at worst, horribly inaccurate.

That's the word from the Department of Transportation, anyway, which last week said it has launched an investigation into the alleged inaccurate scheduling. The New York Times states as many as eight airlines face potential fines for failing to tell the truth in their flight schedules.

An unnamed DOT spokesman told the paper the agency has contacted airlines 160 times for information about delays on specific flights... requests the carriers failed to heed 41 percent of the time.

Information the DOT was able to collect shows 143 flights in February that were late 15 minutes or more, at least 80 percent of the time.

The agency also found one US Airways flight that, literally, is NEVER on time. On average, Flight 154 from Philadelphia to San Francisco arrives 61 minutes behind its published arrival time.

News like that does not sit well with lawmakers, meeting to determine whether federal action is necessary to insure the rights of passengers on airline flights, as the summer travel -- and storm -- season looms.

“I was pretty exasperated,” said House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman James L. Oberstar (D-MN). “They don’t learn from each other,” he added, in reference to carriers failing to learn from the mistakes of their competitors.

The airlines state federal interaction is unnecessary, and the problems would best be left to the individual carriers to solve.

Airlines want to be left alone to deal with the problems, and the Transportation Department has thus far mostly agreed with that approach. But some in Congress feel otherwise.

FMI: www.dot.gov, www.airlines.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC