EAA Applauds New Kit-Built Rules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI-

Airborne Unlimited-

AMA Drone Report-

Airborne Unlimited-

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 03.12.18

Airborne-UnManned 03.13.18

Airborne 03.14.18

AMA Drone Report 03.15.18

Airborne 03.16.18


Airborne 03.12.18

Airborne-UnManned 03.13.18

Airborne 03.14.18

AMA Drone Report 03.15.18

Airborne 03.16.18


Sat, Oct 10, 2009

EAA Applauds New Kit-Built Rules

After Four Years, Many Recommendations Made By EAA, Kitbuilders Included In Final Document

The FAA this week released the long-awaited final order that revises the amateur-built aircraft certification policy known as the 51 percent rule, as well as Advisory Circular 20-27G, the guide for amateur builders on how to properly certify every step of the building process.

These documents are the result of a concerted effort led by the EAA, homebuilders, the kitbuilding industry and other stakeholders. The documents not only update and clarify the amateur-built aircraft building process, they remove the fear many had of not being able to build and fly their own aircraft.

"The new policy is very reflective of the thousands of comments that were sent in by EAA members and amateur builders across the board," said Joe Norris, EAA's homebuilders community manager. "We feel that this new policy is not only a victory for EAA and homebuilders, but also a victory for FAA because it gives them better tools to enforce the regulation and make sure everyone is working under the same set of rules."

EAA President Tom Poberezny said he is "extremely pleased" with the result. "It reinforces the importance of the amateur-built aircraft program to the overall aviation industry. It highlights the integrity of what has been accomplished over the years in terms of the amateur-built program, the development of kits, and overall safety," he said. "It's also an example of collaboration between members of the amateur-built community, EAA and government, specifically FAA."

"The final result is in the best interest of the aviation community too," Poberezny continued, "and promotes the opportunity to design and build the airplane of your dreams."

The changes to the policy address:

  • Standards used to evaluate aircraft kits.
  • The level of builder participation.
  • Professional builder assistance.
  • A clearer definition of fabrication as it applies to the building process.

The revised policy includes many of the recommendation proposed by EAA, kit manufacturers, and builders who responded strongly to the first policy drafts issued by the FAA in 2008. Those drafts diverted from the initial recommendations of the Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC), comprised of FAA and industry representatives including EAA. In that proposed policy, the FAA would have required builders to provide documentation that they had complied with a three-part, percentage-based formula (known as 20-20-11) to ensure they had performed a majority of the "build" work on their aircraft.

The FAA proposal also included a "fabrication" requirement that was ill-defined and could have been hard to enforce. Additionally, kits already available from manufacturers were in danger of having to be modified to comply with the new percentage policy.

"If adopted, the FAA's proposal would have (had) a dampening effect on participation in amateur-building activities," said Earl Lawrence, EAA vice president of industry and regulatory affairs. "That, in turn, would adversely affect kit manufacturers and suppliers of engines, parts, equipment, and accessories. A considerable segment of general aviation could have experienced a downturn."

The response of EAA members and the amateur-built industry compelled the FAA to assemble a second ARC in the fall of 2008 to give further recommendations on a new policy. The just-released policy includes:

  • The privilege to build and fly almost any aircraft one can dream-up.
  • "Grandfathers" existing kits.
  • Creates a uniform standard for new kits to be approved.
  • Eliminates the proposed percentage-based build formula.
  • Defines "fabrication".
  • Provides clearer guidelines for builders who hire professionals to assist with their project.
FMI: www.eaa.org


More News

AMA Drone Report 03.15.18: Penguins and Drones, FPV Flying, NASA Armstrong

Also: Drone Suspected In Wildfire, UAV Airspace Integration, Longest UAV Urban Pkg Delivery, Drone Locates Child For the past 40 years, the total number of Adélie Penguins, >[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 03.13.18: FAA Message, Drone Waiver, NASA Armstrong

Also: Drone Suspected In Wildfire, DroneShield, Moore County Sheriff, Camcopter S-100 Contract During the third annual FAA UAS Symposium, cosponsored by AUVSI, FAA officials said r>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (03.18.18)

“SUU’s Aviation courses include scenario-based training that prepares both instructors and students to aid in these kinds of searches. There is no better training for o>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (03.18.18)

Aero Linx: South Carolina Aviation Safety Council (SCASC) The stated mission of the SCASC is to promote and improve positive attitudes and behaviors towards all areas of aviation s>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (03.18.18): Minimum Vectoring Altitude (MVA)

Minimum Vectoring Altitude (MVA) The lowest MSL altitude at which an IFR aircraft will be vectored by a radar controller, except as otherwise authorized for radar approaches, depar>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus





© 2007 - 2018 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC